Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
CDK4/6 Inhibitor Efficacy in ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer
Maxwell R Lloyd1, Jamie O Brett2,3, Ariel Carmeli4,5
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Background:
In estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) are a common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (ArIh). However, the impact ESR1 alterations have on CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) sensitivity has not been established. Analyses of CDK4/6i trials suggest that the endocrine therapy partner and specific ESR1 allele may affect susceptibility. We analyzed a real-world data set to investigate CDK4/6i efficacy in ESR1m metastatic breast cancer and associated clinical factors.
Methods:
ESR1m were identified by analysis of circulating-tumor deoxyribonucleic acid. The GuardantINFORM database contains genomic information from tumors linked with claims data. Patients who started a CDK4/6i within 30 days of sequencing were categorized as having ESR1m or non-ESR1-mutant (non-ESR1m) breast cancer. Data were analyzed to determine the real-world time-to-next-treatment, defined as the start of a breast cancer treatment to initiation of the subsequent treatment.
Results:
One hundred forty-five patients with ESR1m and 612 with non-ESR1m metastatic breast cancer were analyzed. ESR1m and non-ESR1m tumors had similar real-world time-to-next-treatment on CDK4/6i regimens (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.23). Duration on therapy in the first-line and second-line plus treatment settings were comparable regardless of ESR1 status. We stratified treatment duration by concurrent endocrine therapy, and patients with ESR1m had worse outcomes on ArIh but comparable real-world time-to-next-treatment on fulvestrant.
Conclusions:
These data suggest ESR1 variants are not associated with pan-CDK4/6i resistance and are consistent with the hypothesis that CDK4/6 blockade combined with a selective estrogen receptor degrader is potentially an effective option for ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.
Insights
Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in metastatic breast cancer do not confer resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Real-world data show comparable treatment durations, suggesting CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with fulvestrant may be effective for ESR1-mutated tumors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations are a key mechanism of resistance to aromatase inhibitors in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.
- The impact of ESR1 alterations on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) remains largely unestablished.
- Pre-clinical analyses suggest that ESR1 mutations and endocrine therapy partners may influence CDK4/6i sensitivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with ESR1-mutated (ESR1m) metastatic breast cancer using real-world data.
- To analyze the association between ESR1 mutations and clinical factors influencing CDK4/6i treatment outcomes.
- To evaluate the impact of ESR1 status on time-to-next-treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the GuardantINFORM database, linking genomic data from circulating-tumor DNA with claims data.
- Identified ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) and categorized patients as ESR1m or non-ESR1m.
- Analyzed real-world time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) for patients initiating CDK4/6 inhibitors within 30 days of sequencing.
Main Results:
- Analyzed 145 patients with ESR1m and 612 with non-ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.
- Found similar real-world time-to-next-treatment for ESR1m and non-ESR1m tumors on CDK4/6i regimens (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.82-1.23).
- Observed comparable treatment durations regardless of ESR1 status, but worse outcomes with aromatase inhibitors and comparable outcomes with fulvestrant in ESR1m patients.
Conclusions:
- ESR1 variants are not associated with resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- CDK4/6 blockade combined with fulvestrant (a selective estrogen receptor degrader) is a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for ESR1m metastatic breast cancer.
- These findings support further investigation into combination therapies for ESR1-mutated breast cancer.
More Related Videos
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
06:00Through the Looking Glass: Time-lapse Microscopy and Longitudinal Tracking of Single Cells to Study Anti-cancer Therapeutics
Published on: May 14, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...