SERS Detection of Trace Carcinogenic Aromatic Amines Based on Amorphous MoO3 Monolayers
Xiangyu Meng1, Jian Yu1,2, Wenxiong Shi3
1School of Chemistry, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English)
|May 31, 2024
Summary
Amorphous molybdenum trioxide (a-MoO3) monolayers enable sensitive detection of carcinogenic aromatic amines. This breakthrough utilizes a synergistic plasmon-induced hot-electron transfer and electromagnetic enhancement mechanism for rapid, accurate analysis.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Nanotechnology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Carcinogenic aromatic amines pose significant health risks.
- Rapid and accurate detection methods are crucial for public safety.
- Existing detection techniques may lack sensitivity or speed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel sensing platform for trace detection of aromatic amines.
- To investigate the underlying sensing mechanism involving amorphous molybdenum trioxide.
- To establish the efficacy of amorphous molybdenum trioxide monolayers in detecting carcinogenic compounds.
Main Methods:
- Fabrication of amorphous MoO3 (a-MoO3) monolayers exhibiting localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR).
- Utilizing surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for quantitative detection.
- Investigating plasmon-induced hot-electron transfer (PIHET) and electromagnetic enhancement (EM).
Main Results:
- a-MoO3 monolayers demonstrated a synergistic EM-PIHET enhancement mechanism.
- A significant decrease in hot-electron decay time was observed upon MO absorption, confirming PIHET.
- Achieved a low limit of detection (LOD) of 10^-9 M for o-aminoazotoluene (o-AAT).
- The a-MoO3 monolayers exhibited excellent uniformity, acid resistance, and thermal stability.
Conclusions:
- Amorphous MoO3 monolayers offer a highly sensitive and stable platform for detecting carcinogenic aromatic amines.
- The synergistic EM-PIHET mechanism is key to the enhanced SERS performance.
- This technology holds significant potential for reducing cancer infection rates through early detection.
Related Concept Videos
Basicity of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines
Heterocyclic amines, where the N atom is a part of an alicyclic system, are similar in basicity to alkylamines. Interestingly, the heterocyclic amine having a nitrogen atom as part of an aromatic ring has much less basicity than its corresponding alicyclic counterpart. For this reason, as presented in Figure 1, piperidine (pKb = 2.8) is significantly more basic than pyridine (pKb = 8.8).
2° Amines to N-Nitrosamines: Reaction with NaNO2
Secondary amines react with nitrous acid to form N-nitrosamines, as depicted in Figure 1. Nitrous acid, a weak and unstable acid, is formed in situ from an aqueous solution of sodium nitrite and strong acids, such as hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid, in cold conditions. In the presence of an acid, the nitrous acid gets protonated. The subsequent loss of water results in the formation of the electrophile known as nitrosonium ion.
Physical Properties of Amines
Amines with low molecular weight are usually gaseous at room temperature, while those with high molecular weight are liquid or solids in nature. Usually, low molecular weight amines have a rotten fish-like smell. Diamines typically have a pungent smell. For instance, cadaverine and putrescine, depicted in Figure 1, are two molecules responsible for decaying tissue.
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds
Aromatic compounds can be identified or analyzed using proton NMR and carbon‐13 NMR. Typically, aromatic hydrogens or hydrogens directly bonded to the aromatic rings are strongly deshielded by the aromatic ring current. Therefore, they absorb in the range of 6.5–8.0 ppm in proton NMR spectra. For instance, aromatic hydrogens directly bonded to the benzene ring absorb at 7.3 ppm. However, aromatic hydrogens of larger rings absorb farther upfield or downfield than the ideal range. Consider...
NMR Spectroscopy Of Amines
In proton NMR spectroscopy, primary amines and secondary amines showcase their N–H protons as a broad signal in the chemical shift range between δ 0.5 and 5 ppm. The exact position in this range depends on several factors, including sample concentration, hydrogen bonding, and the type of solvent used. Since amine protons undergo fast proton exchange in solution, the protons are labile and therefore do not participate in any splitting with adjacent protons. Thus, the observed peak is broad and...


