Contradictory Resuscitation Procedure for Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Drawing from a comprehensive Japan-based literature review and the author's personal experience, this article presents findings that highlight potential improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reduced mortality rates, by optimizing the current resuscitation procedure for cardiopulmonary arrest. Many countries have adopted similar procedures for cardiopulmonary arrest. This article presents a prioritized resuscitation method based on scientific evidence, aiming to improve survival rates. The study, which was conducted in Japan, revealed inconsistencies in the current resuscitation procedure for cardiopulmonary arrest. The study did not involve direct participants but relied on literature review for data collection. A literature review was conducted to analyze the survival rates of various resuscitation methods. The interventions reviewed in the literature included cardiopulmonary resuscitation, automated external defibrillator, and automatic mechanical chest compressions. The survival rate of cardiopulmonary arrest in Japan was found to be low. The results of the literature review suggest that cardiopulmonary resuscitation or automatic mechanical chest compressions should be applied before using an automated external defibrillator. The study emphasizes the need to prioritize resuscitation methods with higher survival rates. This article presents a prioritized resuscitation method based on scientific evidence, aiming to improve survival rates. It is hoped that this new approach will lead to a significant improvement in the survival rates of cardiopulmonary arrest patients.