Bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: The effect of urotherapy on incontinence

Achieving urinary continence is a key goal in children born with the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex (BEEC). Unfortunately, this goal is only moderately achieved despite sometimes extensive surgical treatment. Undergoing repeated hospitalization and operations may consequently have a negative impact on quality of life. We therefore believe that other, conservative treatment options should be explored in an earlier stage of incontinence treatment in BEEC patients. As part of this, an intensive urotherapy program based on was offered to patients with persistent incontinence after reconstructive surgery for BEEC.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of intensive urotherapy on incontinence after reconstructive surgery in children with BEEC.

A retrospective chart study was performed including all children who were enrolled in an intensive urotherapy program because of persistent incontinence after reconstructive surgery for BEEC. Urotherapy consisted of a ten-day inpatient training program based on cognitive behavioral therapy, with intensive follow-up by experienced urotherapists. Main outcome measurement was continence, expressed as the percentage of children that achieved complete continence (good result; 100% dry) or 50-99% decrease of wet days a week (improved result) after treatment.

Data of 33 patients with a mean age of 10.6 years were analyzed. In 61% of cases (20/33) an improved or good result was reported on incontinence after urotherapy. Children with classic bladder exstrophy more often achieved a good or improved result (13/16; 81%), compared to children with epispadias (6/16; 38%). The only patient with a cloacal exstrophy completed treatment with an improved result. From the group of patients with persistent incontinence, 75% (12/16) reported that the complaints were socially acceptable at the end of follow-up.

By following our intensive urotherapy program the majority of patients achieved complete continence or improved incontinence. In addition, our results show that the inpatient training program has a positive impact on acceptance in cases of persistent incontinence. The urotherapists offer individualized care and clear guidance, which we deem essential elements of successful treatment. Considering that repeated surgery may impede progress and offers no guarantee of continence, we recommend giving preference to conservative treatment options.

Our results show that 37% (12/33) of patients with BEEC who were enrolled in our intensive urotherapy program because of persistent incontinence after reconstructive surgery, achieved complete continence after urotherapy and 63% (21/33) still experienced some degree of incontinence. 75% of patients who did not achieve complete continence, described the remaining incontinence as socially acceptable. These findings strongly support counselling patients with BEEC to consider conservative treatment before opting for further surgery.