Why •CF2H is nucleophilic but •CF3 is electrophilic in reactions with heterocycles
Meng Duan1, Qianzhen Shao1, Qingyang Zhou1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Abstract:
Radical substitution is a useful method to functionalize heterocycles, as in the venerable Minisci reaction. Empirically observed regiochemistries indicate that the CF2H radical has a nucleophilic character similar to alkyl radicals, but the CF3 radical is electrophilic. While the difference between •CH3 and •CF3 is well understood, the reason that one and two Fs make little difference but the third has a large effect is puzzling. DFT calculations with M06-2X both reproduce experimental selectivities and also lead to an explanation of this difference. Theoretical methods reveal how the F inductive withdrawal and conjugative donation alter radical properties, but only CF3 becomes decidedly electrophilic toward heterocycles. Here, we show a simple model to explain the radical orbital energy trends and resulting nucleophilicity or electrophilicity of fluorinated radicals.
Related Concept Videos
Electrophiles
While a positive electrophile, like a proton, reacts due to its vacant, low-energy 1s orbital, the...
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Fluorination and Iodination of Benzene
Electrophilic Addition to Alkynes: Halogenation
Halogenation is another class of electrophilic addition reactions where a halogen molecule gets added across a π bond. In alkynes, the presence of two π bonds allows for the addition of two equivalents of halogens (bromine or chlorine). The addition of the first halogen molecule forms a trans-dihaloalkene as the major product and the cis isomer as the minor product. Subsequent addition of the second equivalent yields the tetrahalide.
Nucleophiles
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Limitations of Friedel–Crafts Reactions


