Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.3K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.7K
Student t Distribution01:31

Student t Distribution

6.0K
The population standard deviation is rarely known in many day-to-day examples of statistics. When the sample sizes are large, it is easy to estimate the population standard deviation using a confidence interval, which provides results close enough to the original value. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...
6.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.3K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.3K
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square01:18

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

2.9K
Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...
2.9K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimates and confidence intervals for mean postoperative health-care-associated infections per week among operating rooms and other anesthetizing locations.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2026
Same author

Application of machine learning for the prediction of post-operative nausea and vomiting in adult surgical patients - A systematic review.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Timing of intrapartum transfusion among obstetric patients, stratified by admission and discharge haemoglobin, relative to anaesthesia care: A retrospective cohort study.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Classifying American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status With a Low-Rank-Adapted Large Language Model: Development and Validation Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Relationships in anesthesia work areas between contamination measured as colony-forming units, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> detection<i>, and S. aureus</i> transmission.

Anesthesiology and perioperative science·2026
Same author

Tutorial on Analyzing Paired Longitudinal Data With Serial Correlation and Making Comparisons Between Groups, With Examples for Opioid Consumption and Quality of Life.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Generalized Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Standard Deviations Based on Log-Normal Distribution when Times Follow

Pei-Fu Chen1,2, Franklin Dexter3

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei City, Taiwan, 220.

Journal of Medical Systems
|June 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Statistical analysis of anesthesia recovery times using log-normal distribution confidence intervals showed slight bias but reliable P-values. However, wide confidence intervals may increase Type II errors in clinical trials.

Keywords:
Anesthesia timesExtubation timesGeneralized confidence intervalGeneralized pivotal statisticOperative timesRecovery timesStandard deviationsSurgical times

More Related Videos

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.9K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.9K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Statistical analysis in medicine
  • Pharmacoeconomics

Background:

  • Modern anesthetic drugs are crucial for general anesthesia efficacy.
  • Reducing variability in anesthesia recovery times is a key goal.
  • Generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) based on log-normal distribution are used to compare variability (ratios of standard deviations) between groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of using log-normal distribution assumptions for confidence intervals when the true distribution of anesthesia-associated times is Weibull.
  • To assess the reliability of statistical inference for anesthesia recovery time variability under misspecified distribution assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to assess confidence intervals for ratios of standard deviations of anesthesia-associated times.
  • Simulation conditions mimicked meta-analyses of randomized anesthesia trials, using specific sample sizes and coefficients of variation.
  • Analyses assumed a log-normal distribution, while the true data generation followed a Weibull distribution.

Main Results:

  • Estimates of the ratios of standard deviations showed slight positive bias (0.11% to 0.33% greater than nominal).
  • The 95% confidence intervals were notably wide, with over 95% of P-values being greater than or equal to 0.05.
  • Despite statistical significance, the absolute differences in confidence limits were clinically small (maximum difference of 0.016).

Conclusions:

  • P-values < 0.05 remain reliable for detecting differences in variability, even when the log-normal assumption is violated.
  • Investigators should anticipate higher-than-nominal rates of Type II errors due to the wide confidence intervals.
  • While statistically significant differences may be detected, their clinical or managerial relevance might be limited under these conditions.