Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Potential microemboli formation risk and its management during the heated saline-enhanced radiofrequency needle-tip
Atsushi Suzuki1, H Immo Lehmann2, Hiroki Konishi3
1Translational Interventional Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/St. Marys Campus, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Background:
The potential risk of embolic events during ablation in the left ventricle (LV) with a heated saline-enhanced radiofrequency (SERF) needle-tip ablation catheter has not been characterized.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the formation of microemboli or other untoward events during SERF ablation.
Methods:
Ninety-three radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures were performed in the LV of 14 pigs by using a SERF catheter (35 W, 70 seconds, and 60°C; normal or degassed saline [NS or DS] irrigation with a flow rate of 10 mL/min) vs a standard irrigated-tip radiofrequency (S-RF) catheter (30 or 50 W, 30 seconds, and 17 mL/min). Microbubble formation was graded on the basis of intracardiac echocardiography. Microbubbles, microembolic signals, and microparticles were monitored using our established model.
Results:
There was no significant difference in microbubble volume among SERF-NS, SERF-DS, and S-RF 30 W with "grade 1" intracardiac echocardiography microbubbles (median and 25th-75th percentiles 0.201 [0.011-3.13], 0.455 [0.06-2.66], and 0.004 μL [0.00-0.16 μL], respectively). There was no significant difference in microembolic signals among SERF-NS, SERF-DS, and S-RF 30 W with grade 1 bubbles (n = 8.0 ± 5.8, n = 7.6 ± 4.2, and n = 6.1 ± 6.1, respectively). Both SERF-NS and SERF-DS created larger lesions than did both S-RF 30 W and S-RF 50 W deliveries (mean 1241.5 ± 658.6, 1497.7 ± 893.4, 75.0 ± 24.8, and 184.0 ± 93.8 mm3; P < .001). There was no significant difference in microparticle incidence among groups (P = .675). No evidence of embolic events was found in the brain and other organs at the histology assessment.
Conclusion:
In the setting of SERF ablation, significantly large LV lesions can be created without any increment in embolic microbubble or particle events. Grade 1 microbubble is related to the efficacy and safety.
More Related Videos
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management