Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion01:18

Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion

299
Percussion is a fundamental technique used to assess the liver, spleen, and abdominal organs by tapping the abdomen and interpreting the resulting sounds. This method helps identify fluid, distention, and masses through variations in sound, such as the high-pitched tympany of air-filled areas and the dullness of solid masses. Understanding how to percuss these organs provides valuable information for healthcare professionals in diagnosing conditions early.
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
299

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effectiveness and Safety of Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy Across Diverse Patient Heights: A Subset Analysis of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Trial.

Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Pilonidal Surgery Performed in the Setting of Standard Adjunct Laser Hair Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

International wound journal·2026
Same author

Development of Nested Entrustable Professional Activities: A Delphi Consensus Study in General Surgery.

Journal of graduate medical education·2026
Same author

Is imaging the spine enough? Characterizing outcomes in injured patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) of the thoracic or lumbar spine.

Injury·2026
Same author

Integrating Video and Objective Performance Data: Development of VORTEX-SPV for Assessing Robotic Lobectomy Skills.

Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Preclinical Evaluation of the Safety of Robotic-Assisted Ureteroscopy and Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Closing the Feedback Loop: The Feed Protocol for AI-Driven Curricular Reform in Surgical Residency.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

360° Virtual Reality Observation in Neurosurgical Clerkship: A Comparative Study With Surgical Assistant Participation and Conventional Monitor Viewing.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Surgical Case Creation.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

The Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Application and Evaluation of a Formative Feedback Rubric on Nontechnical Skills Using Retrospective SIMPL App Data in General Surgery Residents.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Sexual Harassment in Operating Theatres and Surgical Environments Among Working Professionals: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Reporting Barriers, and Prevention Strategies.

Journal of surgical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
08:27

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: October 28, 2021

2.8K

Comparing Peer and Faculty Feedback for Asynchronous Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition.

Riley Brian1, Brandon Cowan1, Jacquelyn A Knox1

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California.

Journal of Surgical Education
|June 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Peer feedback is as effective as faculty feedback for surgical residents learning basic laparoscopy skills. Residents positively engaged with peer feedback, highlighting its value in a low-stakes learning environment.

Keywords:
asynchronous learninglaparoscopic educationpeer feedbacksimulation training

More Related Videos

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
07:30

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

8.1K
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

19.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
08:27

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: October 28, 2021

2.8K
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
07:30

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

8.1K
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

19.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Simulation
  • Laparoscopic Skills Training

Background:

  • Expert surgeon feedback is traditional for surgical trainees' simulation performance.
  • Time constraints limit expert surgeons' ability to provide timely feedback.
  • The efficacy of peer feedback for laparoscopic skill acquisition in asynchronous settings is unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the effect of peer feedback on residents' laparoscopic performance.
  • To explore residents' perceptions of giving and receiving peer feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Convergent mixed methods study involving randomized residents.
  • Quantitative: Compared in-person laparoscopic assessment scores between peer and faculty feedback groups.
  • Qualitative: Conducted interviews to explore residents' experiences with feedback.

Main Results:

  • Peer feedback group (70.7%) and faculty feedback group (71.8%) showed similar performance on final assessment (p=0.86).
  • Qualitative analysis revealed peer feedback efficacy due to shared mental models, collaborative approach brainstorming, and a low-stakes environment.
  • 13 residents were interviewed exploring their feedback experiences.

Conclusions:

  • Peer and faculty feedback yield comparable outcomes in basic laparoscopic skill acquisition.
  • Residents perceive peer feedback positively, indicating its utility in asynchronous learning.
  • Peer feedback is a viable alternative when residents learn basic laparoscopy.