Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

177
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
177
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

185
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
185
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

92
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
92

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergency integrative supportive care program for frail patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A prospective GERCOR ARCAD study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Circulating tumour DNA in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative-intent LIver MEtastases Surgery in France: a prospective, multicentre GERCOR G-118 CLIMES PRODIGE 77 cohort study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Dual CTLA-4/PD-1 Blockade Versus Anti-PD-1 in MSI-H Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Early Survival Benefit and Exploratory Clinical Predictors.

Clinical colorectal cancer·2026
Same author

PSMC5 Orchestrates an Immunosuppressive Niche and Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer via SMURF1-Mediated K11-Linked Ubiquitination of METTL14.

International journal of biological sciences·2026
Same author

The Trilineage Coexistence Observed During the Differentiation of Porcine EPSCs.

Cells·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab in Combination With Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma: Results of the Phase I/II NEMIO Study.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Interaction analysis of subgroup effects in randomized trials: the essential methodological points.

Abraham Fingerhut1,2, Selman Uranues3, Chadly Dziri4,5

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Abefingerhut@aol.com.

Scientific Reports
|June 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study explored Hemopatch® use in patients undergoing hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure. Results suggest Hemopatch® may reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), warranting further investigation.

Keywords:
Attributable proportionDistal pancreatectomyHemopatch®Interaction analysisPost-operative pancreatic fistulaRandomized trialRelative excess risk due to interactionSecondary analysisSubgroup analysis

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

494
Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

494
Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Subgroup analyses identify patient groups benefiting from interventions but are prone to statistical errors.
  • Interaction tests in subgroup analyses can offer valuable insights into treatment effects.
  • Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication in distal pancreatectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction effect of Hemopatch® on POPF in patients with hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure.
  • To quantify the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP) for POPF.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a prior randomized trial focusing on 135 patients with hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure.
  • Performed subgroup analysis to assess interaction between Hemopatch® use and POPF occurrence.
  • Calculated RERI and AP to evaluate the magnitude of interaction effect.

Main Results:

  • A statistically significant interaction was found (p=0.034).
  • Hemopatch® use was associated with a reduced probability of POPF (RERI = -0.77, p=0.0204).
  • The interaction indicated a 13% lower likelihood of POPF and explained 61.6% of non-POPF cases.

Conclusions:

  • Hemopatch® may potentially decrease POPF rates in distal pancreatectomy with hand-sewn stump closure.
  • The findings generate a hypothesis requiring confirmation through a dedicated, prospective randomized trial.
  • Further research should specifically enroll patients undergoing hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure.