Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Revision of an Adult Burn Center's Resuscitation Guideline Leads to Lower Resuscitation Requirements
Dominick Curry1, Kimberly Wray1, Brandon Hobbs1
1Orlando Regional Medical Center, Warden Burn Center, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
Insights
Updated burn resuscitation guidelines, removing high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) and lowering fluid rates, significantly reduced resuscitation volumes without increasing adverse safety events in burn patients.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Critical Care
Background:
- The 2018 institutional burn resuscitation guideline update aimed to refine fluid management and discontinue high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) therapy.
- Previous protocols involved higher fluid resuscitation volumes (4 mL/kg/TBSA) and HDAA, with evolving evidence prompting a review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of a composite safety outcome (acute kidney injury, intra-abdominal hypertension) between pre- and post-guideline update periods.
- To evaluate secondary outcomes including 24-hour resuscitation volumes, urine output, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation duration.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study design was employed, comparing patient data from before and after the 2018 guideline implementation.
- The primary composite safety outcome and secondary clinical parameters were analyzed between the two groups.
Main Results:
- The composite safety outcome incidence was similar between pre- and post-guideline groups (40% vs 29%; P = .27).
- Significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes (3.74 vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; P < .01) and reduced urine output (1.26 vs 0.75 mL/kg/h; P < .01) were observed in the post-guideline group.
- No significant differences were found in vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality.
Conclusions:
- A simplified burn resuscitation protocol, excluding HDAA and utilizing a lower initial fluid rate, effectively reduced total fluid resuscitation volumes.
- This updated protocol achieved reduced fluid administration without a statistically significant increase in adverse safety events, suggesting improved resuscitation efficiency.
Abstract:
In 2018, the institutional burn resuscitation guideline was updated to remove the use of high-dose ascorbic acid (HDAA) therapy, to lower 24-hour resuscitation fluid estimations from 4 to 2 mL/kg/TBSA, and to optimize guidance around appropriate colloid resuscitation. This retrospective study compared the incidence of a composite safety outcome (acute kidney injury, or intra-abdominal hypertension requiring intervention) between the pre-guideline update to post-guideline update. Secondarily, 24-hour resuscitation volumes, hourly urine output, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation duration were compared as well. The composite safety outcome was similar between the 2 groups (40% vs 29%; P = .27), but the post-group showed significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes (3.74 vs 2.94 mL/kg/TBSA; P < .01), as well as lower urine output (1.26 vs 0.75 mL/kg/h; P < .01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality. This study suggests that a simplified resuscitation protocol without HDAA, combined with a lower starting fluid rate, led to significantly lower 24-hour resuscitation volumes without an increase in adverse safety events.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV

