Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Inclusion of a skeletal model partly improves the reliability of lower limb joint angles derived from a markerless
Tyler J Collings1, Daniel Devaprakash2, Claudio Pizzolato1
1School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Australia; Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), In The Menzies Health Institute Queensland and Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Australia.
Abstract:
A single depth camera provides a fast and easy approach to performing biomechanical assessments in a clinical setting; however, there are currently no established methods to reliably determine joint angles from these devices. The primary aim of this study was to compare joint angles as well as the between-day reliability of direct kinematics to model-constrained inverse kinematics recorded using a single markerless depth camera during a range of clinical and athletic movement assessments.A secondary aim was to determine the minimum number of trials required to maximize reliability. Eighteen healthy participants attended two testing sessions one week apart. Tasks included treadmill walking, treadmill running, single-leg squats, single-leg countermovement jumps, bilateral countermovement jumps, and drop vertical jumps. Keypoint data were processed using direct kinematics as well as in OpenSim using a full-body musculoskeletal model and inverse kinematics. Kinematic methods were compared using statistical parametric mapping and between-day reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute error, and minimal detectable change. Keypoint-derived inverse kinematics resulted in significantly smaller hip flexion (range = -9 to -2°), hip abduction (range = -3 to -2°), knee flexion (range = -5° to -2°), and greater dorsiflexion angles (range = 6-15°) than direct kinematics. Both markerless kinematic methods had high between-day reliability (inverse kinematics ICC 95 %CI = 0.83-0.90; direct kinematics ICC 95 %CI = 0.80-0.93). For certain tasks and joints, keypoint-derived inverse kinematics resulted in greater reliability (up to 0.47 ICC) and smaller minimal detectable changes (up to 13°) than direct kinematics. Performing 2-4 trials was sufficient to maximize reliability for most tasks. A single markerless depth camera can reliably measure lower limb joint angles, and skeletal model-constrained inverse kinematics improves lower limb joint angle reliability for certain tasks and joints.
