Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

91
Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
91
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

66
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
66
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

80
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
80
Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview01:05

Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview

119
Multicompartmental models are crucial tools in pharmacokinetics, providing a framework to understand how drugs move within the body. The two-compartment model is a crucial subtype, segmenting the body into central and peripheral compartments. The central compartment represents areas with high blood flow, such as plasma and highly perfused organs like the kidneys and liver, while the peripheral compartment signifies tissues with lower blood flow, like adipose tissue and muscle tissue.
The...
119
Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model01:20

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

5.4K
The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...
5.4K
Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration01:12

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

180
The two-compartment model for extravascular administration represents a drug's absorption and distribution process. It features a central compartment, where the drug is first absorbed, and a peripheral compartment, which illustrates the drug's distribution throughout the body. The rate of change in drug concentration in the central compartment is calculated by three exponents: absorption, distribution, and elimination.
The absorption exponent (ka) indicates the speed at which the drug...
180

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vitabel: A Python Framework for Visualizing and Labelling High-Resolution Physiological Data for Critical Care Machine Learning.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same author

MR-Guided PET Denoising and Resolution Enhancement Improves Visual Interpretation and Preserves Quantitative Behavior Across Amyloid Tracers.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Strengths and weaknesses of energy-based scatter estimation using three basis functions.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Object independent scatter sensitivities for PET, applied to scatter estimation through fast Monte Carlo simulation.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Joint estimation of activity, attenuation and motion in respiratory-self-gated time-of-flight PET.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Combined brain and spinal FDG PET in the differentiation between ALS and ALS mimics - correction and additional validation study.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
10:21

Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function

Published on: August 8, 2019

8.3K

Exact parameter identification in PET pharmacokinetic modeling using the irreversible two tissue compartment model.

Martin Holler1, Erion Morina1, Georg Schramm2,3

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|June 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study mathematically proves that quantitative dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) can identify metabolic tissue parameters without arterial blood sampling. This simplifies kinetic parameter estimation in dynamic PET imaging.

Keywords:
Tikhonov regularizationexact reconstructioniteratively regularized Gauss Newton methodquantitative PET imagingtwo-tissue compartment model

More Related Videos

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.3K
Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
07:07

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT

Published on: May 2, 2017

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
10:21

Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function

Published on: August 8, 2019

8.3K
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.3K
Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
07:07

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT

Published on: May 2, 2017

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear medicine
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Mathematical modeling

Background:

  • Quantitative dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) relies on tissue concentration and arterial input function for kinetic parameter estimation.
  • Arterial input function is typically derived from blood sampling, a complex and invasive procedure.
  • Mathematical analysis is lacking regarding the necessity of specific arterial blood measurements for kinetic parameter identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To mathematically analyze the necessity of arterial blood measurements for kinetic parameter identification in dynamic PET.
  • To determine if kinetic parameters can be identified without arterial input function measurements.
  • To investigate the impact of noise on parameter identification.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical approach using the irreversible two-tissue compartment model for dynamic PET data.
  • Application of Tikhonov regularization to address noisy measurements.
  • Numerical simulations to illustrate analytical findings in a synthetic example.

Main Results:

  • Mathematical proofs demonstrate unique identification of all metabolic tissue parameters without arterial blood sampling.
  • A consistency result shows stable reconstruction of ground-truth parameters in the vanishing noise limit.
  • Numerical experiments suggest approximate kinetic parameter reconstruction is feasible with moderate noise.

Conclusions:

  • Fully quantitative dynamic PET imaging is theoretically possible without arterial blood sampling for irreversible tracers.
  • This analytical result simplifies the process of kinetic parameter estimation in dynamic PET.
  • Eliminating blood sampling could reduce costs and complexity in clinical PET applications.