Epidemiologic Trends of Cleft Lip and Palate in a Southern State: A 30-Year Follow-Up

Madyson I Brown1, Martin G McCandless1, Samuel J Hopper1

  • 1From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

PubMed

Insights

Orofacial cleft (OFC) incidence in Mississippi has decreased overall since historical data, with changing regional patterns observed. Rates increased in non-White infants but decreased statewide, suggesting potential shifts in risk factors or access to care.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Medicine
  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Public Health Epidemiology

Background:

  • Children's of Mississippi is the sole American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved cleft team in the state.
  • Limited data exists on geographic and demographic patterns of orofacial cleft (OFC) patients treated at this center.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze geographic and demographic trends of orofacial cleft (OFC) patients treated at Children's of Mississippi from 2015 to 2020.
  • To compare current OFC incidence with historical data and examine regional variations within Mississippi.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 184 OFC patients treated between 2015-2020.
  • Demographic data, including birth county and live births, were collected and analyzed.
  • Incidence rates were compared across Mississippi public health regions using ANOVA and contrasted with historical 1980-1989 data.

Main Results:

  • Statewide OFC incidence was 0.83 per 1000 live births (n=222,819).
  • Incidence rates were similar for White (0.83/1000) and non-White (0.82/1000) infants, contrasting with historical data (1.36 and 0.54, respectively).
  • Significantly lower OFC incidence was found in the northern region (0.25/1000) compared to central (1.21/1000) and southern (0.86/1000) regions.

Conclusions:

  • Current OFC incidence in Mississippi has decreased compared to historical rates, despite an increase among non-White infants.
  • Observed regional disparities in OFC incidence may indicate actual pattern changes, proximity to the treatment center, or access to care issues.
  • Further research is needed to elucidate regional risk factors and access to cleft care across Mississippi.
Abstract