Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

4.8K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of maintenance BCG versus gemcitabine/docetaxel following BCG induction in NMIBC.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Characteristics of North American Indigenous Inflammatory Skin Disease: A Systematic Scoping Review.

International journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Disease Duration Among Patients Recruited to Alopecia Areata Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery·2026
Same author

Hair Loss Associated With IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

International journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Letter Regarding: Reimaging High-Grade Blunt Hepatic Injuries: Revisiting the Role of Routine Surveillance in Modern Nonoperative Management.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

The Seasonal Trend of Brittle Nails: A Google Trends Analysis of English-speaking Countries.

Acta dermato-venereologica·2026
Same journal

Reply to: Acrylate Copolymers/Crosspolymers in Sunscreens: Minimally Allergenic, Without Evidence of Need for Avoidance by (Meth)acrylate-Sensitized Individuals.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Propylene Glycol and Related Glycols: Cosmetic Skin Sensitisers After All?

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Acrylate Copolymers/Crosspolymers in Sunscreens: Minimally Allergenic, Without Evidence of Need for Avoidance by (Meth)Acrylate-Sensitized Individuals.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

AI-Assisted Automated Two-Stage Patch Test Interpretation System Using Vision Transformer.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Use of Tralokinumab in a Hairdresser With Severe Chronic Hand Eczema and Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Cyclohexyl Diethanolamine in a Metalworking Fluid.

Contact dermatitis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Mouse Ear Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation
08:02

A Mouse Ear Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.4K

Diagnosing contact dermatitis using machine learning: A review.

Eric McMullen1, Rajan Grewal1, Kyle Storm2

  • 1Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Contact Dermatitis
|June 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) shows promise in diagnosing contact dermatitis (CD). While research is limited, ML models can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in clinical settings.

Keywords:
contact dermatitisdiagnosismachine learningpatch testing

More Related Videos

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
09:37

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Published on: August 18, 2022

2.3K
Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus
05:38

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Published on: May 16, 2025

57

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Mouse Ear Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation
08:02

A Mouse Ear Model for Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.4K
Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
09:37

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Published on: August 18, 2022

2.3K
Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus
05:38

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Published on: May 16, 2025

57

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) presents a significant opportunity to advance contact dermatitis (CD) research.
  • Integrating ML with comprehensive clinical data may enhance diagnostic capabilities and patch test precision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature on the application of ML in contact dermatitis.
  • To explore the potential of ML in supporting diagnosis and improving patch test accuracy in CD.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was performed across Embase, Medline, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library up to February 7, 2024.
  • Included studies focused on primary research reporting ML models applied to contact dermatitis.

Main Results:

  • Six studies met the inclusion criteria after reviewing 7834 identified articles.
  • ML models were utilized to identify biomarkers, differentiate between allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) using image and clinical data, and predict patch test positivity.
  • Supervised learning was employed across all models, encompassing a total of 49,704 patients, though accuracy reporting was sparse.

Conclusions:

  • Despite limited current research, ML demonstrates potential as a supportive tool for clinical diagnosis in contact dermatitis.
  • Further investigation into the clinical implementation and validation of ML in CD management is warranted.