Biomarker-driven basket trial designs: origins and new methodological developments

Yue Tu1, Lindsay A Renfro2

  • 1Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Insights

This review explores basket trials for precision medicine, examining traditional designs, challenges, and novel Bayesian and Frequentist adaptations for molecularly-driven cancer therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Advances in gene sequencing have deepened the molecular understanding of cancer, impacting diagnosis and treatment response assessment.
  • Precision medicine aims to tailor treatments using molecularly-driven interventions and predictive biomarkers.
  • Basket trials are a key design for evaluating targeted therapies across various cancer types irrespective of tumor location.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of traditional basket trial designs.
  • To identify and discuss practical challenges associated with existing basket trial methodologies.
  • To review recent innovative adaptations of basket trials from Bayesian and Classical Frequentist viewpoints.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of traditional and novel basket trial designs.
  • Categorization of new adaptations into Bayesian and Classical Frequentist approaches.
  • Analysis of practical challenges and proposed solutions for basket trial implementation.

Main Results:

  • Traditional basket trial designs and their inherent limitations are presented.
  • Novel adaptations, including Bayesian and Frequentist methods, offer potential solutions to design challenges.
  • The review synthesizes advancements in evaluating biomarker-targeted therapies.

Conclusions:

  • Newer basket trial designs aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of precision medicine research.
  • Understanding the advantages and limitations of these novel designs is crucial for future clinical trial development.
  • These adaptations hold promise for advancing the goals of molecularly-targeted cancer therapy.

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...