Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Individualized Surgeon Reports in a Statewide Registry: A Pathway to Improved Outcomes
J Wesley Mesko1, Huiyong Zheng2, Richard E Hughes3
1Michigan Orthopaedic Center, Lansing, Michigan.
Surgeons can now access personalized joint replacement data to improve patient outcomes. This quality improvement tool compares individual surgeon performance with state-wide averages for hip and knee arthroplasty.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Joint replacement registries are crucial for quality improvement but lack comprehensive surgeon-specific outcome data in the US.
- Existing international registries demonstrate the feasibility of achieving complete coverage and patient matching.
- Surgeons need actionable data to assess their performance and identify areas for improvement in joint replacement care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a surgeon-specific reporting system for hip and knee arthroplasty within a statewide registry.
- To provide surgeons with comparative data on survivorship, complications, and patient-reported outcomes.
- To enhance the quality of care and reduce variability in joint replacement procedures in Michigan.
Main Methods:
- Leveraging a comprehensive statewide joint replacement registry in Michigan.
- Developing surgeon-specific reports including survivorship and complication data.
- Utilizing statistical tools like funnel plots and cumulative sum (CUSUM) reports for performance monitoring.
- Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into the reporting system.
Main Results:
- The developed system provides hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons with detailed, surgeon-specific performance data.
- Reports enable comparisons of individual outcomes with those of peers across the state.
- The system facilitates the identification of variations in care delivery and potential areas for quality enhancement.
Conclusions:
- Surgeon-specific reporting, built upon a robust statewide registry, empowers orthopedic surgeons with data for quality improvement.
- This initiative aims to decrease variability in hip and knee arthroplasty care, leading to better patient outcomes and value.
- The Michigan registry's surgeon-specific reports represent a significant step towards data-driven quality assurance in joint replacement surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Data Reporting and Recording
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

