Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Rapidly Varying Flow01:24

Rapidly Varying Flow

59
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
59
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

43
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
43
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response01:29

Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

65
Geographic Information System (GIS) technology is essential for risk identification, action prioritization, and resource optimization in critical situations like flooding and earthquakes. By integrating spatial and demographic data, GIS provides a comprehensive framework for emergency response.GIS integrates data layers, like rainfall intensity, topography, elevation profiles, and river levels, to model high-risk flood zones. These layers assess areas susceptible to flooding based on their...
65
Gradually Varying Flow01:29

Gradually Varying Flow

43
Gradually varying flow (GVF) in open channels describes situations where water depth changes slowly along the channel due to factors like non-uniform bed slope, channel shape variations, or obstructions. This flow type occurs when the depth adjusts gradually to balance gravitational forces, shear forces, and energy requirements, resulting in a low rate of depth change.Characteristics of Gradually Varying FlowGVF is commonly observed in natural streams, rivers, and canals, where flow depth...
43
Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

354
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
354
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway01:21

Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway

159
Scaled hydraulic models of dam spillways provide a practical way to replicate and study the intricate flow dynamics of these structures. Often built to a 1:15 ratio, these models allow for observing critical water behavior, such as velocity distribution, flow patterns, and energy dissipation.
159

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-level charged micelle-based microneedle transdermal system for immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment regulation and synergistic therapy.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Lead fraction transformation drives microbial functional recovery and coupled nutrient cycling-metal resistance networks in Pb-Zn tailings.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Linking (Poly)Tungstate Speciation to Toxicity and Bioaccumulation in <i>Daphnia magna</i>.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Integrative analysis of gastric tissue transcriptomes and gastric cancer GWAS implicates candidate susceptibility genes.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

Stage-dependent zinc detoxification and allocation in rice revealed by Zn isotopes and transporter expression.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Species- and time-dependent responses of earthworm and microoganisms during nano-hydroxyapatite remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil.

Environmental research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events
06:26

Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events

Published on: November 7, 2017

16.0K

Research on runoff process vectorization and integration of deep learning algorithms for flood forecasting.

Chengshuai Liu1, Wenzhong Li1, Caihong Hu1

  • 1School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.

Journal of Environmental Management
|June 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The new Runoff Process Vectorization (RPV) method significantly improves deep learning flood forecasting accuracy. RPV-DL models outperform standard deep learning models, especially for 4-6 hour lead times, aiding water resource management.

Keywords:
Deep learningFlood forecastMiddle Yellow river basinMulti-steps aheadRPV-DL modelRunoff process vectorization

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.4K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

735

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events
06:26

Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events

Published on: November 7, 2017

16.0K
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.4K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

735

Area of Science:

  • Hydrology and Water Resources
  • Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Science
  • Geospatial Data Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate multi-step ahead flood forecasting is essential for effective flood prevention, mitigation, and water resource management.
  • Existing deep learning (DL) models face challenges in accurately predicting flood runoff, particularly with longer lead times.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel Runoff Process Vectorization (RPV) method integrated with deep learning models for enhanced flood forecasting.
  • To compare the performance of RPV-integrated DL models against traditional DL models using real-world flood runoff data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of RPV-DL models: RPV-LSTM, RPV-TCN, and RPV-Transformer.
  • Evaluation using observed flood runoff data from nine typical basins in the middle Yellow River region.
  • Comparative analysis of RPV-DL models versus standalone DL models based on Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative error (RE).

Main Results:

  • RPV-DL models consistently outperformed traditional DL models across all evaluated metrics (NSE, RMSE, RE) in the nine basins.
  • Significant improvements were observed, with average NSE increases of 2.82%-22.21% and reductions in RMSE (10.86-28.81%) and RE (36.14%-51.35%).
  • The RPV-TCN model demonstrated superior performance in minimizing forecast errors, particularly for lead times of 4-6 hours, showing NSE improvements of 9.77%-17.94%.

Conclusions:

  • The Runoff Process Vectorization method substantially enhances the accuracy and predictive performance of deep learning models for flood forecasting.
  • RPV-DL models offer a more reliable approach to flood prediction, crucial for informing flood prevention and water resource management strategies.
  • The findings provide strong scientific evidence supporting the adoption of RPV-DL models in operational flood forecasting systems.