Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Implementation and evaluation of interprofessional overdose review team recommendations following intentional or
Monica Barrett1,2, Sarah Kemerer1, Michelle Colvard2
1Clinical Pharmacy Practitioner, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Hinesville, Georgia.
Abstract:
Drug overdose death rates in the United States remain high despite efforts to mitigate this risk. Many communities and hospitals across the country have implemented overdose review teams, including local overdose fatality review teams or postoverdose intervention programs, to address the opioid crisis. The goal of most of these teams is to identify missed opportunities or patient-specific interventions to prevent future opioid overdose fatalities. Few overdose review teams review a combination of both fatal and nonfatal overdose events. The Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System implemented a novel overdose review team (ORT) that collaboratively reviews all overdose incidents regardless of fatality, intent, or substance involved. This practice description characterizes reported facility overdose events and patient-specific risk-mitigation strategies recommended by the ORT, highlights the implementation rate and time to implementation of ORT recommendations, and discusses potential areas for process improvement. This practice highlights the potential impact of a pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary ORT following accidental or intentional overdose events involving any substance or medication. Key patient-specific interventions implemented following ORT recommendations included overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution, prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder and/or alcohol use disorder, reducing medication supply to limit lethal means access, and facilitation of mental health and/or substance use disorder specialty appointments. Further research to evaluate clinical outcomes related to specific ORT interventions should be considered.
Insights
A novel overdose review team (ORT) reviews all overdose incidents, fatal or nonfatal, to identify patient-specific interventions. This pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary approach aims to prevent future overdose deaths and improve patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pharmacology
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Drug overdose deaths remain a significant public health issue in the US.
- Existing overdose review teams often focus solely on fatal events.
- There is a need for comprehensive strategies to prevent overdose fatalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe a novel, pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary overdose review team (ORT) model.
- To characterize overdose events and interventions recommended by the ORT.
- To evaluate the implementation of ORT recommendations.
Main Methods:
- The Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System implemented an ORT reviewing all overdose incidents (fatal/nonfatal, any substance).
- The ORT identified patient-specific risk-mitigation strategies.
- Implementation rates and time to implementation of recommendations were tracked.
Main Results:
- Key interventions included overdose prevention education, naloxone distribution, and medication for opioid/alcohol use disorder prescribing.
- Reducing lethal means access and facilitating mental health/substance use disorder appointments were also implemented.
- The study highlights the potential impact of a comprehensive, pharmacist-led ORT.
Conclusions:
- A pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary ORT reviewing all overdose incidents can identify crucial patient-specific interventions.
- Interventions focused on overdose prevention, harm reduction, and treatment access.
- Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ORT interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...

