Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

362
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
362
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.1K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.1K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

503
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
503

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy and safety of electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation during pregnancy: a case review and literature analysis.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

Macro- and micro-scale mechanical properties and energy evolution analysis during unidirectional freeze-thaw cycling of sandstone.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Identification of genes directly regulated by LvBlimp1 in shrimp macrophage-like phagocytes.

Developmental and comparative immunology·2026
Same author

LvBlimp1 and LvHes1 coregulate the function of macrophage-like phagocytes in shrimp hemolymph.

Fish & shellfish immunology·2026
Same author

Transcriptomic profiling and experimental validation of myeloid-cell-differentiation-related key genes in osteoarthritis.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same author

Damage characteristics and constitutive modeling of coal under real-time temperatures.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
08:23

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 9, 2018

8.9K

AI-Enabled Portable E-Nose Regression Predicting Harmful Molecules in a Gas Mixture.

Jilei Yang1, Xuefeng Hu1, Lihang Feng2,3

  • 1Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Measuring Theory and Precision Instrument, School of Instrument Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.

ACS Sensors
|June 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

A new fusion network model significantly improves the accuracy of biomimetic electronic noses for predicting gas mixture concentrations. This advanced technology enhances the detection of pollutants like SO2, NO2, and CO in complex environments.

Keywords:
1DCNN_LSTMTMKFF moduleconcentration regression predictionelectronic nosefusion networkgas mixture

More Related Videos

Fruit Volatile Analysis Using an Electronic Nose
11:02

Fruit Volatile Analysis Using an Electronic Nose

Published on: March 30, 2012

21.4K
Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles
05:07

Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
08:23

Real-time Breath Analysis by Using Secondary Nanoelectrospray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 9, 2018

8.9K
Fruit Volatile Analysis Using an Electronic Nose
11:02

Fruit Volatile Analysis Using an Electronic Nose

Published on: March 30, 2012

21.4K
Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles
05:07

Development of a Nose-only Inhalation Toxicity Test Chamber That Provides Four Exposure Concentrations of Nano-sized Particles

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Biomimetic electronic nose (e-nose) technology offers novel capabilities for identifying and monitoring complex gas molecules.
  • Traditional regression algorithms struggle with the accuracy of e-noses in predicting gas concentrations due to mixture complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an advanced fusion network model for enhanced regression prediction of gas mixture concentrations using a portable e-nose.
  • To overcome the limitations of existing models in accurately assessing complex gas compositions.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a fusion network model integrating a transformer-based multikernel feature fusion (TMKFF) module with a 1DCNN-LSTM network.
  • Utilizing a portable electronic nose for experimental validation of the proposed model.

Main Results:

  • The fusion network model demonstrated significantly superior regression prediction performance compared to individual CNN and LSTM models.
  • High determination coefficient (R²) values (93-99%) indicate strong model capability in explaining concentration variations.
  • Low root-mean-square errors (RMSE) and mean absolute errors (MAE) confirm the model's accuracy in predicting SO2, NO2, and CO concentrations, especially for low-concentration SO2.

Conclusions:

  • The developed fusion network model effectively enhances the accuracy of gas mixture concentration prediction in portable e-noses.
  • The model shows significant potential for practical applications in atmospheric pollution monitoring and molecular detection in complex environments.