Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of the Cellular Microenvironment in Patient Glioblastoma Resections
Published on: July 31, 2017
Resolving spatial response heterogeneity in glioblastoma.
Julian Ziegenfeuter1, Claire Delbridge2, Denise Bernhardt3
1Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675, München, Germany. Julian@ziegenfeuter.de.
Accurate glioblastoma response assessment is challenging due to tumor heterogeneity. Advanced imaging analysis accurately differentiates true tumor progression from pseudoprogression, aiding personalized treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Radiology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Glioblastoma (GBM) presents significant challenges for treatment response assessment due to its spatial intratumoral heterogeneity.
- Multimodal imaging and advanced image analysis offer potential solutions for evaluating GBM response heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an automated image analysis pipeline for distinguishing true tumor progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in glioblastoma using multimodal imaging.
- To assess the spatial heterogeneity of glioblastoma response to treatment.
Main Methods:
- Automated tumor segmentation and longitudinal registration were used to categorize contrast-enhancing voxels in 61 patients.
- Cerebral blood volume (CBV), FET-PET, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) imaging data were grouped into supervoxels for feature extraction.
- A Random Forest classifier was trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation, with performance evaluated by AUC and classification metrics.
Main Results:
- The image analysis pipeline achieved 80.0% accuracy and a macro-weighted AUC of 0.875 in differentiating TP from PsP on supervoxel level.
- FET-PET-derived features, particularly the 10th/90th percentile and median of tumor-to-background normalized FET-PET, were significant predictors.
- CBV- and T1c-related features also contributed to the model's predictive performance.
Conclusions:
- Automated multimodal image analysis enables reliable spatial assessment of glioblastoma treatment response.
- This approach holds promise for improving the precision of local response evaluation in glioblastoma.
- Findings support the development of more personalized and localized treatment strategies for glioblastoma patients.
More Related Videos
09:09Laser Capture Microdissection of Glioma Subregions for Spatial and Molecular Characterization of Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Oncostreams, and Invasion
Published on: April 12, 2020
09:17Digital Spatial Profiling for Characterization of the Microenvironment in Adult-Type Diffusely Infiltrating Glioma
Published on: September 13, 2022