Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Combining descriptive and predictive modeling to systematically design depth filtration-based harvest processes for
Peter Liu1, Michael Hartmann2, Ajay Shankaran1
1Biologics Process Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract:
Advances in upstream production of biologics-particularly intensified fed-batch processes beyond 10% cell solids-have severely strained harvest operations, especially depth filtration. Bioreactors containing high amounts of cell debris (more than 40% particles <10 µm in diameter) are increasingly common and drive the need for more robust depth filtration processes, while accelerated timelines emphasize the need for predictive tools to accelerate development. Both needs are constrained by the current limited mechanistic understanding of the harvest filter-feedstream system. Historically, process development relied on screening scale-down depth filter devices and conditions to define throughput before fouling, indicated by increasing differential pressure and/or particle breakthrough (measured via turbidity). This approach is straightforward, but resource-intensive, and its results are inherently limited by the variability of the feedstream. Semi-empirical models have been developed from first principles to describe various mechanisms of filter fouling, that is, pore constriction, pore blocking, and/or surface deposit. Fitting these models to experimental data can assist in identifying the dominant fouling mechanism. Still, this approach sees limited application to guide process development, as it is descriptive, not predictive. To address this gap, we developed a hybrid modeling approach. Leveraging historical bench scale filtration process data, we built a partial least squares regression model to predict particle breakthrough from filter and feedstream attributes, and leveraged the model to demonstrate prediction of filter performance a priori. The fouling models are used to interpret and provide physical meaning to these computational models. This hybrid approach-combining the mechanistic insights of fouling models and the predictive capability of computational models-was used to establish a robust platform strategy for depth filtration of Chinese hamster ovary cell cultures. As new data continues to teach the computational models, in silico tools will become an essential part of harvest process development by enabling prospective experimental design, reducing total experimental load, and accelerating development under strict timelines.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Designing Growth Media for Bioreactors
Methods of Medium Optimization
Upstream Processing

