Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
Moral decision-making in context: Behavioral and neural processes underlying allocations based on need, merit, and
Peter Vavra1, Elijah P Galván2, Alan G Sanfey3
1Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Biological Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
People dynamically adjust fairness judgments based on context, switching between merit, need, or equality principles. Neuroimaging reveals distinct brain activity patterns associated with these dynamic fairness decisions.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Decision-Making
Background:
- Fairness in resource allocation is crucial for social decision-making.
- Existing models often assume stable fairness assessments, overlooking dynamic adjustments.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the dynamic nature of fairness judgments.
- Identify neural mechanisms underlying context-dependent fairness evaluations and re-allocation decisions.
Main Methods:
- Introduced the Re-Allocation Game, a novel task involving computer-generated allocations and player re-allocation opportunities.
- Utilized functional neuroimaging (fMRI) to monitor brain activity during fairness assessments.
- Manipulated contextual information (financial status, performance, random data) presented to participants.
Main Results:
- Participants frequently re-allocated resources to anonymous others, demonstrating prosocial behavior.
- Fairness principles (merit, need, equality) were dynamically applied based on provided contextual information.
- Distinct neural activity was observed in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, precuneus, and putamen, correlating with fairness judgments and re-allocation decisions.
Conclusions:
- Fairness judgments are not static but dynamically shift based on context.
- Cognitive control and theory-of-mind networks are involved in evaluating and enacting fairness.
- Neural patterns in the precuneus and putamen predict subsequent resource re-allocation choices.
Related Concept Videos
Egoism and Altruism
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Ethics and Bioethics

