Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
Published on: March 17, 2019
Reward value and internal state differentially drive impulsivity and motivation
Ruth Albert-Lyons1, Selin Capan1, Ka H Ng1
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6207 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Internal state and reward value differentially impact motivation and impulsivity. Thirst and sucrose concentration affected motivation and impulsive action, but not impulsive choice, highlighting distinct influences on goal-directed behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral Science
- Decision Making
Background:
- Goal-directed behavior is modulated by reward value and internal states like hunger or thirst.
- Research has extensively studied how these factors influence motivation, but less is known about their differential effects on impulsivity subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how internal drive (thirst) and reward value (sucrose concentration) differentially affect motivation, impulsive action, and impulsive choice in rodent models.
- To explore the distinct roles of homeostatic state versus reward value in shaping different facets of reward-related behavior.
Main Methods:
- Reward value was manipulated by varying sucrose concentration.
- Internal drive was altered through water restriction to induce thirst.
- Behavioral paradigms assessed motivation, premature responding (impulsive action), and delay discounting (impulsive choice).
Main Results:
- Both internal state and reward value influenced overall motivation.
- In high-effort tasks, internal state significantly drove motivation, while reward value had minimal impact.
- Internal state and, to a lesser extent, reward value affected impulsive action (premature responding).
- Neither reward value nor homeostatic state significantly impacted impulsive choice (delay discounting).
Conclusions:
- Internal state and reward value exert differential influences on distinct components of motivated and impulsive behavior.
- Understanding these distinctions is crucial for developing targeted interventions for individuals with disrupted motivated or impulsive behaviors.
Related Concept Videos
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Reason and Intuition
Instinctive Drift

