Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resolution of Pediatric Trigger Finger After Combined A1 Pulley Release, A2 Pulley Partial Release, and Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon Split.

The Journal of hand surgery·2026
Same author

Pediatric trigger thumb: clinical management update.

Current opinion in pediatrics·2026
Same author

The International Summit on Health Benefits of Physical Fitness for People With Down Syndrome: Current Science, Gaps, Priorities, and Research Opportunities.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2025
Same author

Modular Splined Tapered Stems Through the Direct Anterior Approach: Should I Make an Accessory Incision?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Jumping on the moon as a potential exercise countermeasure.

Experimental physiology·2025
Same author

The influence of cuff location on the oxygenation and reperfusion of the foot during ischemic preconditioning: A reliability study.

Microvascular research·2025
Same journal

Incidental Discovery of Ochronosis During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same journal

Low Rate of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Dorr Type B and C Femurs With the Anterior Approach Using Stems Cemented According to the "French Paradox".

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same journal

Sex-Based Differences in 90-Day Postoperative Complications Among Anemic Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same journal

Trends and Outcomes in Technology-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2020 to 2024.

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same journal

Can an Artificial Intelligence Application Raise Awareness of Dislocation Risk After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same journal

Mildly Elevated Preoperative Inflammatory Markers and Postoperative Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis.

Arthroplasty today·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
06:17

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.7K

Does Artificial Intelligence Outperform Humans Using Fluoroscopic-Assisted Computer Navigation for Total Hip

Justin M Cardenas1, Dan Gordon2, Bradford S Waddell1

  • 1W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic, Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction, Dallas, TX, USA.

Arthroplasty Today
|June 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and human control in total hip arthroplasty navigation show similar accuracy for acetabular component positioning and leg length discrepancy. This study found no significant difference between AI-assisted and manual navigation systems in achieving optimal surgical outcomes.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceComputer navigationDirect anterior approachFluoroscopyTotal hip arthroplasty

More Related Videos

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.3K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
06:17

Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.7K
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.3K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Medical Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Accurate implant positioning is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • Intraoperative fluoroscopic-assisted computer navigation can enhance THA accuracy.
  • The comparative accuracy of AI-driven versus human-controlled navigation for acetabular component position and leg length discrepancy (LLD) remains unstudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of AI-controlled navigation software with human-controlled software in assessing acetabular component position and LLD during THA.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 420 primary THAs using fluoroscopic-assisted computer navigation.
  • Two cohorts were compared: 211 THAs with manual (human technician) navigation and 209 THAs with AI-automated navigation.
  • Acetabular component inclination, anteversion, and LLD were recorded intraoperatively and compared with postoperative radiographs.

Main Results:

  • Cup placement within the Lewinnek "safe zone" was high in both groups (94% manual vs. 95% AI, P = 1.0).
  • Accuracy for LLD within ±2 mm was similar (69% manual vs. 66% AI, P = 0.47).
  • High accuracy for LLD within ±5 mm was also observed in both groups (99% manual vs. 98% AI, P = 0.45).

Conclusions:

  • AI-controlled and human-controlled navigation platforms demonstrate comparable accuracy in achieving optimal acetabular component positioning and LLD during THA.
  • The findings suggest AI can be a reliable tool in navigation-assisted THA without compromising accuracy.