Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
Published on: February 22, 2020
Judicial Opinion 130
David R Arahal1, Carolee T Bull2, Henrik Christensen3
1Departamento de Microbiología y Ecología, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
Opinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published cyanobacterial name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. The Judicial Commission also clarifies that it has the means to resolve such cases by conserving a name over an earlier homonym. It is concluded that the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is significantly more important than the name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 and therefore the former is conserved over the latter. This makes the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) legitimate.
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Torts II
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...

