Accuracy of virtual articulation in maximal intercuspal position in direct and indirect digital workflows for fixed...

To assess the accuracy of virtual articulation in direct digital workflow (DDW) and indirect digital workflow (IDW) in arches prepared for fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

Five pairs of master models were used in this study representing different clinical scenarios of full dentate (FD), and prepared arches for fixed partial dentures as follows: FD group, short span posterior (SSP group), long span posterior (LSP group), short span anterior (SSA group), and long span anterior (LSA). Fourteen pairs of interarch reference points were added to each set of master models to measure linear interarch distance with a caliper (reference measurements). The direct digital workflow included digital scans and virtual articulation with buccal scan images using an intraoral scanner. The indirect digital workflow included conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions and bites followed by pouring, mounting, and scanning the stone models in a laboratory scanner. The scanned stone models were virtually articulated with buccal scanning in the laboratory scanner. Digital linear interarch measurements on all virtually-articulated models were compared with reference measurements. The absolute mean differences in linear interarch distances were calculated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for statistical analysis (α = .05).

The direct digital workflow produced significantly less linear interarch deviations in the virtually articulated models compared to the indirect digital workflow for all study groups (P < .05). However, the direct digital workflow had significantly less accuracy for virtual articulation in long span posterior, long span anterior, and short span anterior groups compared to the full dentate group.  CONCLUSIONS: Both workflows produced virtually-articulated models with acceptable accuracy. However, the direct digital workflow had significantly better accuracy in all assessed clinical scenarios.