Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
[Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting 3-month mortality risk in patients with sepsis-associated
Xiao Yue1, Zhifang Li, Lei Wang
1Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China. Corresponding author: Wang Zhengbin,
Objective:
To develop and evaluate a nomogram prediction model for the 3-month mortality risk of patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI).
Methods:
Based on the American Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- IV (MIMIC- IV), clinical data of S-AKI patients from 2008 to 2021 were collected. Initially, 58 relevant predictive factors were included, with all-cause mortality within 3 months as the outcome event. The data were divided into training and testing sets at a 7 : 3 ratio. In the training set, univariate Logistic regression analysis was used for preliminary variable screening. Multicollinearity analysis, Lasso regression, and random forest algorithm were employed for variable selection, combined with the clinical application value of variables, to establish a multivariable Logistic regression model, visualized using a nomogram. In the testing set, the predictive value of the model was evaluated through internal validation. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the discrimination of nomogram model and Oxford acute severity of illness score (OASIS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome score (SIRS). The calibration curve was used to evaluate the calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the net benefit at different probability thresholds.
Results:
Based on the survival status at 3 months after diagnosis, patients were divided into 7 768 (68.54%) survivors and 3 566 (31.46%) death. In the training set, after multiple screenings, 7 variables were finally included in the nomogram model: Logistic organ dysfunction system (LODS), Charlson comorbidity index, urine output, international normalized ratio (INR), respiratory support mode, blood urea nitrogen, and age. Internal validation in the testing set showed that the AUC of nomogram model was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.80-0.82], higher than the OASIS score's 0.70 (95%CI was 0.69-0.71) and significantly higher than the SOFA score's 0.57 (95%CI was 0.56-0.58) and SIRS score's 0.56 (95%CI was 0.55-0.57), indicating good discrimination. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram model's calibration was better than the OASIS, SOFA, and SIRS scores. The DCA curve suggested that the nomogram model's clinical net benefit was better than the OASIS, SOFA, and SIRS scores at different probability thresholds.
Conclusions:
A nomogram prediction model for the 3-month mortality risk of S-AKI patients, based on clinical big data from MIMIC- IV and including seven variables, demonstrates good discriminative ability and calibration, providing an effective new tool for assessing the prognosis of S-AKI patients.
Insights
A new nomogram model accurately predicts 3-month mortality risk in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) patients. This tool, using seven clinical variables, offers better prognostic assessment than existing scores.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology and Critical Care Medicine
- Biostatistics and Predictive Modeling
Background:
- Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is a significant cause of mortality in intensive care units.
- Accurate prediction of mortality risk is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.
- Existing scoring systems may not fully capture the complexity of S-AKI prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a nomogram prediction model for 3-month mortality in S-AKI patients.
- To compare the predictive performance of the nomogram with established clinical scores (OASIS, SOFA, SIRS).
Main Methods:
- Utilized clinical data from the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2021) for S-AKI patients.
- Employed logistic regression, Lasso, and random forest algorithms for variable selection, identifying 7 key predictors.
- Validated the nomogram internally using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Main Results:
- The nomogram model included 7 variables: LODS, Charlson comorbidity index, urine output, INR, respiratory support, BUN, and age.
- Achieved an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.80-0.82), outperforming OASIS (0.70), SOFA (0.57), and SIRS (0.56) scores.
- Demonstrated superior calibration and clinical net benefit compared to OASIS, SOFA, and SIRS scores via DCA.
Conclusions:
- The developed nomogram is a robust and effective tool for predicting 3-month mortality in S-AKI patients.
- The model offers improved discriminative ability and calibration over existing clinical severity scores.
- This nomogram provides valuable prognostic information for clinical decision-making in S-AKI management.

