Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

08:20
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
Published on: October 27, 2023
1.4K
Automating detection of diagnostic error of infectious diseases using machine learning
Kelly S Peterson1,2, Alec B Chapman2,3, Wathsala Widanagamaachchi2,3
1Veterans Health Administration, Office of Analytics and Performance Integration, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States of America.
PLOS Digital Health
|June 7, 2024
Summary
This study introduces an automated method using electronic health records to detect potential diagnostic errors in emergency departments, aiming to improve patient safety and reduce mortality risks.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Diagnostic errors contribute significantly to patient morbidity and mortality.
- Current methods for identifying diagnostic errors are manual, costly, and not real-time.
- Electronic health record (EHR) data offers potential for automated misdiagnosis detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an automated approach for identifying diagnostic divergence in emergency department (ED) infectious disease cases.
- To measure diagnostic deviation by comparing predicted diagnoses with documented diagnoses, weighted by mortality risk.
- To assess the utility of machine learning models in detecting potential misdiagnoses at scale.
Main Methods:
- Trained two machine learning models to predict infectious disease and mortality using the first 24 hours of EHR data.
- Analyzed 6.5 million ED visits across over 100 emergency departments.
- Validated the automated approach against manual chart reviews by clinicians using Spearman rank correlation.
Main Results:
- The infectious disease model achieved a Macro F1 score of 86.7 and AUROC of 90.6-94.7.
- The mortality model achieved a Macro F1 score of 97.6 and AUROC of 89.1.
- Positive correlations (0.231-0.358) were observed between the automated metric and manual clinician reviews.
Conclusions:
- The proposed automated approach shows promise for identifying diagnostic errors in real-world clinical settings.
- This method can serve as a valuable tool for clinicians to detect potential misdiagnoses.
- Future work should incorporate data structure and natural language processing for enhanced accuracy and explainability.

