Constructing analogies: Developing critical thinking through a collaborative task
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Students dramatically improved critical thinking skills by creating complex analogies in pairs. This collaborative approach enhances learning and is essential for academic and professional success.
Area Of Science
- Biology Education
- Cognitive Science
Background
- Analogies are common in STEM education for simplifying complex topics.
- Typically, instructors generate analogies, limiting student engagement and skill development.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate if students creating extended analogies enhances content knowledge and critical thinking.
- To compare the impact of individual versus collaborative analogy construction.
Main Methods
- Qualitative study with 30 college biology students.
- Students constructed analogies on genetic information flow, first with familiar, then challenging items.
- Analogy complexity and content knowledge were scored using a novel scheme.
Main Results
- Students showed moderate improvement with practice alone.
- Significant gains in critical thinking were observed when students collaborated in pairs.
- Collaborative analogy construction yielded greater improvements than individual work.
Conclusions
- Having students construct complex analogies in pairs is a high-impact educational practice.
- Collaboration fosters critical thinking by requiring justification and critique of ideas.
- This method is crucial for developing essential academic and professional skills.
Related Concept Videos
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
• Confidence: Confidence tends to grow with experience in recognizing strengths and limitations. One example is performing IV cannulations.
• Independent thinking: Independent thinking is essential to improve and expand nursing practice. An example is selecting nursing interventions that are best for the patient.
• Fairness: Fairness...
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
During adolescence, individuals experience significant cognitive development that enhances their understanding of others' emotions and thoughts, known as cognitive empathy. This period is marked by an increased ability to adapt to others' perspectives and a more nuanced understanding of others' mental states, a skill that is foundational for social problem-solving and conflict avoidance. The development of cognitive empathy relies heavily on the theory of mind — the...
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
Trial and Error: This involves testing multiple solutions until one works. Thomas Edison exemplified this by testing thousands of filaments for the light bulb. It's not the most efficient process, but it's often necessary when no clear path exists.
Algorithms:...

