Impulse and reason? Justifications in problem gambling

  • 0Centre for Gambling Research, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Canada.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Gamblers use justifications to rationalize their behavior, which are linked to problem gambling severity. This thinking style may not be separate from impulsivity, suggesting a new area for gambling research.

Area Of Science

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Addiction Research

Background

  • Justifications are commonly used to support choices in various behaviors.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding justificatory thoughts specifically within gambling behavior.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To investigate the presence and impact of justificatory thinking in individuals with gambling problems.
  • To determine if justifications are associated with problem gambling severity, beyond impulsivity and cognitive distortions.

Main Methods

  • Two online surveys were conducted with gamblers seeking to reduce their gambling (Study 1: n=101, Study 2: n=154).
  • Justifications, previously identified in eating and consumer behavior, were assessed.
  • Associations between justifications, problem gambling severity, trait impulsivity, and cognitive distortions were examined.

Main Results

  • Justificatory thinking was positively associated with problem gambling severity in both studies, even after controlling for impulsivity and cognitive distortions.
  • Justifications also correlated positively with trait urgency and cognitive distortions.
  • These findings suggest justificatory thinking is not independent of impulsivity.

Conclusions

  • Justificatory thinking is present in the context of gambling and is related to problem gambling severity.
  • This cognitive process may be an overlooked factor in understanding gambling-related cognitions.
  • Further research into gambling justifications could inform interventions.

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition 01:37

6.4K

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...

Fundamental Attribution Error 01:14

12.8K

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping 02:05

39.0K

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...

Self-Discrepancy Theory 02:45

18.3K

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  

According to the self-discrepancy theory, people hold beliefs about what they’re really like—their actual self—as well as what they would ideally like to be—their ideal...

Timing and Consequences on Behavior 01:08

88

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...

Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena 01:15

465

Drug dependence, abuse, and addiction are complex phenomena that can precipitate various abnormal states. Physical dependence refers to a state of pharmacological adaptation to a drug. This adaptation often results in tolerance—a reduced response to the drug after repeated administrations. When the drug use is abruptly stopped, withdrawal symptoms occur due to the body's need to readjust from the pharmacologically induced imbalance. However, tolerance and withdrawal symptoms do not...