Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025
Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
Inferring malignancy grade of soft tissue sarcomas from magnetic resonance imaging features: A systematic review
Fabian Schmitz1, Sam Sedaghat1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Purpose:
Systematic reviews on the grading of STS using MRI are lacking. This review analyses the role of different MRI features in inferring the histological grade of STS.
Materials And Methods:
A systematic review was conducted and is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE were systematically searched for literature addressing the correlation of MRI findings in soft tissue sarcoma with tumor grade. As keywords "MRI", "magnetic resonance imaging", "sarcoma", "grade", "grading", and "FNCLCC" have been selected.
Results:
14 studies have been included in this systematic review. Tumor size (p = 0.015 (51 patients) to p = 0.81 (36 patients)), tumor margin (p < 0.001 (95 patients) to 0.93 (36 patients)), necrosis (p = 0.004 (50 patients) to p = 0.65 (95 patients)), peritumoral edema (p = 0.002 (130 patients) to p = 0.337 (40 patients)), contrast enhancement (p < 0.01 (50 patients) to 0.019 (51 patients)) and polycyclic/multilobulated tumor configuration (p = 0.008 (71 patients)) were significantly associated with STS malignancy grade in most of the included studies. Heterogeneity in T2w images (p = 0.003 (130 patients) to 0.202 (40 patients)), signal intensity in T1w images/ hemorrhage (p = 0.02 (130 patients) to 0.5 (31 patients)), peritumoral contrast enhancement (p < 0.001 (95 patients) to 0.253 (51 patients)) and tumoral diffusion restriction (p = 0.01 (51 patients) to 0.53 (52 patients)) were regarded as significantly associated with FNCLCC grade in some of the studies which investigated these features. Most other MRI features were not significant.
Conclusion:
Several MRI features, such as tumor size, necrosis, peritumoral edema, peritumoral contrast enhancement, intratumoral contrast enhancement, and polycyclic/multilobulated tumor configuration may indicate the malignancy grade of STS. However, further studies are needed to gain consensus.
