Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery Versus No Intervention in Patients with Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Insights
Adding mitral valve surgery (MVs) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) increases short-term complications but shows similar long-term outcomes. Further research is needed for severe cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is linked to poorer long-term prognoses.
- Optimal management strategies for moderate IMR during CABG remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of concurrent mitral valve surgery (MVs) with CABG on long-term outcomes in patients with moderate IMR.
- To compare short-term and long-term results between CABG alone and CABG with MVs.
Main Methods:
- An observational study analyzed 3,215 patients from the Juntendo CABG registry with moderate IMR and multivessel coronary artery disease.
- Propensity score matching was employed to compare outcomes between 40 pairs of patients undergoing CABG alone versus CABG with MVs.
- Long-term endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).
Main Results:
- Mitral valve surgery (MVs) during CABG was associated with higher rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation, blood transfusions, and prolonged hospitalization.
- Despite increased short-term complications, long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and MACCEs, were similar between the two groups.
- The analysis included 101 patients initially, with 40 matched pairs for the final comparison.
Conclusions:
- Combining MVs with CABG for moderate IMR increases non-fatal short-term complications compared to CABG alone.
- Long-term survival and MACCEs appear comparable between CABG with MVs and CABG alone for moderate IMR.
- Further investigation is warranted to clarify the role of MVs in patients with moderate IMR and severe coronary artery disease.
Objectives:
Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with worse long-term outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of mitral valve repair with CABG in patients with moderate IMR.
Materials:
This observational study enrolled 3,215 consecutive patients from the Juntendo CABG registry with moderate IMR and multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent CABG between 2002 and 2017.
Methods:
The CABG alone and CABG with mitral valve surgery (MVs) groups were compared. The propensity score was calculated for each patient. Long-term all-cause death, cardiac death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were compared.
Results:
Our database had 101 patients who underwent CABG with moderate IMR. Propensity score matching selected 40 pairs for final analysis. MVs was associated with increased risks of postoperative atrial fibrillation, blood transfusion, and longer hospitalization. Long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and the incidence of MACCEs were similar.
Conclusion:
Surgical treatment of moderate IMR combined with CABG was related to increased risk of several non-fatal short-term complications when compared to CABG alone, with similar long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of MVs in patients with moderate IMR and severe coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

