Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K
Sources of Law01:26

Sources of Law

1.1K
Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
1.1K
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

674
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
674
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Loss Counterfactuals.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
Same journal

Gross Negligence in Bank Payments Law.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
Same journal

'Singapore on Thames' Metropolitan Dreams and Planning Regimes.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
Same journal

Defective Buildings Are a Nuisance.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Interpretive Obligation: Empirical Insights into the Use of Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
Same journal

Taking International Law Seriously? Interpretation of the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday Agreement in the Context of Article 2(1) of the Windsor Framework.

Oxford journal of legal studies·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.1K

Contract Law When the Poor Pay More.

Joseph Spooner

    Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
    |June 10, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Consumer markets and contract law significantly contribute to wealth inequality. This article examines how product design and pricing practices, like contingent charges, can exacerbate this issue, urging greater legal scrutiny.

    Keywords:
    adjudicationconsumer lawcontract lawdistributive justiceequality

    More Related Videos

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    693
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    5.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

    Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
    11:51

    Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

    Published on: March 2, 2011

    15.1K
    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    693
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    5.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Socio-economics
    • Contract Law
    • Consumer Market Regulation

    Background:

    • Inequality is a major societal challenge.
    • Consumer markets and their legal frameworks influence wealth distribution.
    • Product design and pricing practices can lead to inequitable outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the role of consumer markets and contract law in wealth inequality.
    • To analyze how contractual terms and pricing practices facilitate wealth diversion.
    • To critically assess the legal validation of contingent pricing models.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of product design within contractual terms.
    • Examination of the legality of contingent pricing practices.
    • In-depth case study of *Beavis v ParkingEye* (2015).
    • Review of contract law principles and market failure analysis.

    Main Results:

    • Firms can use product design (contractual terms) to evade competition and concentrate wealth.
    • Contingent pricing practices challenge fundamental contract law principles.
    • The UK Supreme Court's validation of contingent pricing in *Beavis v ParkingEye* lacks traditional legal and economic justification.

    Conclusions:

    • Contract law significantly shapes market distributions with economic and political consequences.
    • There is a need for increased scrutiny of contract law adjudication's contribution to inequality.
    • Legal frameworks must better address the role of markets in perpetuating wealth disparities.