Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

31.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.9K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When do two wrongs make a right? Schadenfreude and the legitimization of illegal attacks against corrupt national institutions.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Fight, Flight, or Vote Right? A Systematic Review of Threat Sensitivity in Political Conservatism.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

When Confidence in Institutions Backfires: Power-Distance Orientation Moderates the Relationship Between Institutional Trust and Civic Honesty Across Eight Countries.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2025
Same author

The psychology of criminal authority: Introducing the Legitimacy of Secret Power Scale.

Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR·2025
Same author

The International Climate Psychology Collaboration: Climate change-related data collected from 63 countries.

Scientific data·2024
Same author

Alternative Systems: The Interplay Between Criminal Groups' Influence and Political Trust on Civic Honesty in the Global Context.

Social psychological and personality science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.7K

Secret disclosure and social relationships in groups.

Giovanni A Travaglino1, John M Levine2, Dominik-Borna Ćepulić3

  • 1Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations : GPIR
|June 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

People are more likely to reveal personal secrets in Communal Sharing and Equality Matching groups. Identity fusion also plays a role in secret disclosure within these social structures.

Keywords:
Relational Models theorygroup dynamicsidentity fusionsecrets

More Related Videos

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
05:03

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

13.7K
Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
05:03

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics
  • Human Sociality

Background:

  • Personal secrets are common in group settings.
  • The dynamics influencing secret disclosure within different social structures remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between models of human sociality and the revelation of personal secrets.
  • To identify which social structures facilitate greater secret disclosure.

Main Methods:

  • Five studies were conducted, examining secret disclosure across four models of human sociality: Communal Sharing, Equality Matching, Authority Ranking, and Market Pricing.
  • Methods included assessing willingness to disclose secrets in hypothetical groups, rating group governance models, and examining actual disclosure in established group types.
  • Identity fusion was also measured as a predictor in Study 3.

Main Results:

  • Secret disclosure was most strongly associated with Communal Sharing and Equality Matching group models.
  • Participants were more willing to disclose secrets in hypothetical groups aligned with Communal Sharing and Equality Matching.
  • Identity fusion significantly predicted secret disclosure in Communal Sharing and Equality Matching groups.

Conclusions:

  • Communal Sharing and Equality Matching represent social environments conducive to personal secret disclosure.
  • Understanding these social dynamics is crucial for comprehending interpersonal trust and intimacy within groups.
  • Identity fusion emerges as a key psychological factor influencing vulnerability and openness in specific group contexts.