Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Qualitative Analysis01:10

Qualitative Analysis

244
Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
244
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Menopause and musculoskeletal health in English primary care: study protocol.

BJGP open·2026
Same author

Pressure Ulcer Prevention at Home for People with Long-term Neurological Conditions, Carers and Personal Assistants: Synopsis - a Participatory, Qualitative study (PUP@Home1).

Health and social care delivery research·2026
Same author

Higher disease burden and greater small fibre impairment in women with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Pain reports·2026
Same author

Exploring the use of pre-hospital pre-alerts and their impact on patients, Ambulance Service and Emergency Department staff: a mixed-methods study.

Health and social care delivery research·2026
Same author

Identifying aspects of palliative and end-of-life care that are most important to people with lived experience and can be measured using routine data: a series of patient and public involvement workshops.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of polyhexanide, chlorhexidine with neomycin and mupirocin for nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonisation: non-inferiority RCT (TIDE).

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Evaluating a grant development public involvement funding scheme: a qualitative document analysis.

Alexis Foster1, Sharon Caunt2, Holly Schofield3

  • 1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Yorkshire, UK. alexis.foster@sheffield.ac.uk.

Research Involvement and Engagement
|June 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) funding awards helped researchers, particularly early-career ones, strengthen grant applications. However, funding limits and short timeframes hindered comprehensive PPI, highlighting the need for more support and training.

Keywords:
Early career researchersGrant developmentPPI resourcesPublic contributors

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Grant Funding
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is crucial in health and social care research grant development.
  • Researchers often lack dedicated funding for PPI during the grant application phase.
  • The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research Design Service provided Public Involvement Fund Awards to address this gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the usefulness of the Public Involvement Fund Awards in supporting PPI during grant development.
  • To identify learning points for future PPI support schemes for researchers.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative document analysis of 55 post-activity reports from fund recipients.
  • Iterative coding process involving researchers and Public Contributors.
  • A workshop with Public Contributors to refine findings.

Main Results:

  • The fund was particularly valuable for early-career researchers and clinicians lacking other PPI funding sources.
  • Awards enabled PPI, which researchers reported strengthened their grant applications.
  • Limitations included the £600 award cap and a three-month expenditure window, restricting PPI to one or two consultations and posing challenges for diverse recruitment and group sessions due to grant deadlines.

Conclusions:

  • Public Involvement Fund Awards are instrumental for researchers, especially early-career ones, in conducting PPI for grant applications.
  • Widespread availability of similar schemes is recommended.
  • Future schemes should offer adequate funding and longer award durations for comprehensive PPI throughout the grant development process.
  • Ongoing training for researchers on undertaking PPI is essential.