Peer education as a strategy to promote vaccine acceptance: A randomized controlled trial within New York community

Emily Hoffman1, Tamara Kahan2, Esther Auerbach3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Vaccine
|June 11, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Peer-led vaccine education significantly increased pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccination acceptance in a randomized trial. This intervention proved most effective for infants under one year old, reducing vaccination delays.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatric Medicine
  • Health Behavior

Background:

  • Strategies to enhance vaccine acceptance are crucial for public health.
  • Parental vaccine hesitancy, particularly for pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccination, presents a significant challenge.
  • Community-based interventions are being explored to improve vaccination rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led vaccine education intervention in increasing parental acceptance of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccination.
  • To assess if this intervention, delivered within community medical practices, can overcome vaccine deferral.
  • To determine the impact of peer counseling on timely infant immunization.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial was conducted in predominantly Hasidic Jewish neighborhoods in New York from March 2022 to July 2023.
  • Parents of children due/overdue for pneumococcal vaccination were randomized to receive routine care or routine care plus peer education.
  • Peer educators utilized motivational interviewing and vaccine science to counsel parents; outcomes were assessed at 90 days post-enrollment.

Main Results:

  • The peer education group showed significantly higher rates of at least one pneumococcal vaccine dose (28.4%) compared to the control group (12.9%).
  • The risk ratio for vaccination in the intervention arm was 2.21 (95% CI: 1.09-4.49, p=0.022).
  • The intervention demonstrated a stronger effect in younger children (under 1 year), with 34% receiving vaccination versus 12.7% in the control group (RR 2.67, p=0.009).

Conclusions:

  • Peer-led vaccine education is an effective strategy to improve pediatric vaccine acceptance.
  • This intervention shows particular promise in reducing vaccination delays among younger infants.
  • Community-based peer education can be a valuable tool in public health initiatives to increase immunization coverage.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
11.4K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K