Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.7K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

111
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
111
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Language-related eligibility criteria in UK randomised trials: a systematic review of extended research reports.

Trials·2026
Same author

Clinical trial participant information leaflets overstate the harms/risks of participation and understate the benefits.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Evaluating a co-developed pet robot intervention and implementation for residents with dementia in long-term care.

Frontiers in dementia·2026
Same author

Retention in trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for trial non-completion.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Influences on recruitment and retention to mental health randomized controlled trials from the perspective of trial staff: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Planning retention strategies in clinical trials-a qualitative interview study with members of trial teams.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K

Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges-a systematic review.

Frances Shiely1,2, Niamh O Shea3,4, Ellen Murphy3,4

  • 1Trials Research and Methodologies Unit, HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, 4th Floor Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland. f.shiely@ucc.ie.

Trials
|June 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Registry-based randomized controlled trials (rRCTs) leverage patient registries for efficient recruitment and data collection. Optimizing registry design and data management is key to maximizing the benefits of these pragmatic trials.

Keywords:
Registry-based randomised controlled trialsTrials methodology

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health Research

Background:

  • Registry-based randomized controlled trials (rRCTs) utilize existing patient data within registries to streamline clinical trial processes.
  • While the use of registries in randomized trials is growing, their application within rRCTs remains inconsistent.
  • This systematic review examines the conduct of rRCTs using patient registries for recruitment and outcome data collection, exploring associated advantages and challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and explore the conduct of registry-based randomized controlled trials (rRCTs).
  • To identify and discuss the advantages and challenges associated with using patient registries in rRCTs.
  • To provide recommendations for optimizing the design and conduct of future rRCTs.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed across five major databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, CENTRAL) from inception to June 2020.
  • Search strategy included MESH terms and keywords related to registry-based randomized controlled trials.
  • Study selection and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers, followed by a narrative synthesis of findings.

Main Results:

  • The review included 24 registry-based randomized controlled trials (rRCTs) from 47,862 screened titles.
  • Eleven rRCTs (45.8%) utilized multiple registries, and six (25%) employed registry-embedded randomization modules.
  • Reported advantages include enhanced recruitment efficiency, reduced trial duration, cost-effectiveness, complete outcome data, and lower participant burden; challenges involve data management, quality assurance, and informed consent timing.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of registry-based randomized controlled trials (rRCTs) is significantly influenced by the capabilities of the underlying patient registries.
  • Future registry development and existing registry reviews should prioritize features enabling robust rRCT conduct.
  • Consistent emphasis on data management and quality assurance is crucial, alongside clear reporting of registry-based methods in publications to improve database indexing.