Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

123
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
123
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

705
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
705
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

1.3K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.3K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

150
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
150
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

1.6K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2026
Same author

Performance of multivariable risk prediction algorithms in predicting COPD exacerbations: a population-based study.

Thorax·2026
Same author

Development of an asthma policy model for Canada: Lifetime Exposures and Asthma outcomes Projection.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model for Major Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Nationwide Primary Care Electronic Medical Records Cohort Study.

Pragmatic and observational research·2026
Same author

Bayesian Sample Size Calculations for External Validation Studies of Risk Prediction Models.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Getting more than early detection from lung cancer screening.

Thorax·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Non-parametric inference on calibration of predicted risks.

Mohsen Sadatsafavi1, John Petkau2

  • 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel "bridge" test for assessing moderate calibration in risk prediction models. This new method offers a more powerful and reliable way to detect miscalibration without arbitrary data grouping.

Keywords:
calibrationhypothesis testinginferencerisk prediction

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Moderate calibration is crucial for reliable risk prediction models, ensuring predicted probabilities align with observed event frequencies.
  • Existing methods for assessing moderate calibration often rely on data smoothing or grouping, lacking standardized inferential approaches.
  • There is a need for robust statistical methods to evaluate the null hypothesis of moderate calibration in binary outcome prediction models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss existing and propose novel methods for assessing moderate calibration in risk prediction models for binary responses.
  • To develop a unified inferential framework for evaluating both mean and moderate calibration simultaneously.
  • To introduce a powerful and data-driven approach for detecting model miscalibration.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing limiting distributions of standardized partial sums of prediction errors converging to Brownian motion laws.
  • Developing a novel method based on Brownian bridge properties for joint inference on mean and moderate calibration.
  • Introducing a unified "bridge" test for detecting miscalibration in risk prediction models.

Main Results:

  • Simulation studies demonstrate the superior power of the proposed bridge test compared to alternative methods.
  • The bridge test effectively assesses moderate calibration without arbitrary data grouping or parameter tuning.
  • The study provides a case study on a heart attack mortality prediction model, including graphical presentation and interpretation guidelines.

Conclusions:

  • The novel bridge test provides a statistically sound and powerful tool for assessing moderate calibration in risk prediction models.
  • This method enhances the reliability of risk predictions by offering a unified approach to evaluate calibration properties.
  • The findings facilitate more accurate and interpretable risk predictions in clinical settings, such as predicting short-term mortality after heart attack.