Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

07:43
Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
18.9K
Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey
Mai C Arlien-Søborg1, Jakob Dal2,3, Ansgar Heck4
1Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clinical Endocrinology
|June 12, 2024
Summary
Nordic experts show significant disagreement on acromegaly treatment guidelines. While pituitary surgery is favored first-line, consensus is lacking on medical therapies like somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Medicine
- Medical Guidelines
Background:
- Acromegaly, a condition of excess growth hormone, carries significant morbidity and mortality risks if untreated.
- Current treatment options include surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy, with existing guidelines lacking strong evidence.
- Evaluating expert consensus on acromegaly management in Nordic countries is crucial for refining treatment protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the level of agreement among Nordic experts regarding the treatment and follow-up of acromegaly patients.
- To identify areas of consensus and disagreement in acromegaly management strategies within the Nordic region.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi process involving 47 endocrinologists from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland.
- Development and rating of 37 statements on acromegaly treatment and follow-up using a 7-point Likert scale.
- Consensus defined as ≥80% agreement (score ≥5 or ≤3).
Main Results:
- Consensus was achieved on only 41% (15/37) of the statements, indicating substantial disagreement.
- Experts agreed on pituitary surgery as first-line treatment, with somatostatin analog (SSA) and repeat surgery as options after failure.
- Disagreement was noted regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, pasireotide, and dopamine agonist treatments.
Conclusions:
- A significant degree of expert disagreement exists in acromegaly management across Nordic countries.
- This lack of consensus highlights the complexity of acromegaly and the need for more evidence-based data.
- Findings suggest a need for further research and guideline development to standardize acromegaly care.

