New Perspectives in The Management of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Dual AntiArrhythmic Medications

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice projected to affect 12.1 million individuals by the year 2030. Patients who are diagnosed with AF have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Although catheter ablation is a class I treatment recommendation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, antiarrhythmic medications (AAM) continue to be the mainstay of treatment in limited resource settings not offering ablation procedures. Currently, the most used AAMs are those which block either the sodium or potassium channels. We hypothesized that the use of selective dual AAM (sodium and potassium channel blockers) (DAAM) improves the chance of maintaining sinus rhythm and decreases the need for catheter ablation when compared with single AAM (SAAM). This retrospective observational study was conducted in 150 patients with paroxysmal AF over 5 years at Richmond University Medical Center in Staten Island, New York. The following data were collected: age, sex, comorbidities, electrocardiogram findings, ejection fraction by echocardiography, classes of AAM, duration, and response to treatments. The primary endpoint included the absence of symptoms and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The secondary endpoint included the requirement of electrical cardioversion or catheter ablation. A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria in our analysis. The average age of the patients was 71.06 years (SD = 7.66). About 45 patients were given DAAM of either amiodarone + flecainide or dronedarone + flecainide and were treated for an average of 15.4 months, followed by catheter ablation, if needed. Also, 41 patients received a SAAM followed by catheter ablation, if needed. A Mann-Whitney test indicated that electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation were greater for the SAAM group (Md = 1) than for the DAAM group (Md = 0) (U = 294.00, P value <0.001; U = 507.00, P value <0.001, respectively). No pro-arrhythmic side effects or death were encountered in either group. Treatment of paroxysmal AF with DAAM is effective compared with SAAM and is less likely to need catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to further explore the use of DAAM in the management of paroxysmal AF and its clinical impact in limited resource settings.