Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.2K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.2K
Overview
21.2K
Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

196
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations,...
196
Migration00:53

Migration

7.9K
Migration is long-range, seasonal movement from one region or habitat to another. This common strategy, carried out by many different organisms around the world, is an adaptive response that typically corresponds to changes in an organism’s environment, like resource availability or climate. Migrations can involve huge groups of thousands of animals as well as single individuals traveling alone and can range from thousands of kilometers to just a few hundred meters.
7.9K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.0K
Life Histories01:29

Life Histories

17.9K
Overview
17.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Random and non-random variation in flower colour along an urban-rural gradient in the introduced mustard Hesperis matronalis.

Annals of botany·2026
Same author

Together again: the invasive mustard <i>Hesperis matronalis</i> suffers devastating seed predation by a recently adventive specialist weevil.

BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Evidence That Metapopulation Dynamics Maintain a Species' Range Limit.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Combined empirical techniques reveal key role for variation in plasticity in a novel environment.

The New phytologist·2023
Same author

Population bottleneck associated with but likely preceded the recent evolution of self-fertilization in a coastal dune plant.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023
Same author

Long-term persistence of experimental populations beyond a species' natural range.

Ecology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

18.3K

Is adaptation associated with long-term persistence beyond a geographic range limit?

Regan L Cross1, Christopher G Eckert1

  • 1Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|June 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Coastal dune plants (Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia) experimentally moved beyond their range showed no adaptation after 10 generations. Persistence in new habitats may not require adaptation, facilitating climate change responses.

Keywords:
climate changedelayed reproductionlocal adaptationrange limitsrange shiftstransplant experiment

More Related Videos

A Molecular Readout of Long-term Olfactory Adaptation in C. elegans
11:30

A Molecular Readout of Long-term Olfactory Adaptation in C. elegans

Published on: December 22, 2012

10.8K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

18.3K
A Molecular Readout of Long-term Olfactory Adaptation in C. elegans
11:30

A Molecular Readout of Long-term Olfactory Adaptation in C. elegans

Published on: December 22, 2012

10.8K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Plant Science

Background:

  • Species range shifts are crucial for adapting to climate change.
  • Coastal dune plants (Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia) were used to study adaptation to new habitats.
  • Previous work showed high fitness but delayed reproduction in beyond-range transplants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test for adaptation to beyond-range conditions in experimental populations of C. cheiranthifolia.
  • To investigate if genetic variation and environmental heterogeneity drive adaptation.
  • To determine if adaptation is necessary for persistence in novel environments.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental populations of C. cheiranthifolia were transplanted within and beyond their poleward range limit in 2005.
  • Descendants (after 10 generations) from beyond- and within-range populations were transplanted to multiple sites.
  • Fitness and reproductive timing were assessed across different sites.

Main Results:

  • Individuals from beyond-range populations did not show increased fitness at beyond-range sites, indicating no adaptation.
  • Beyond-range descendants did not suffer reduced fitness within the native range.
  • Reproduction was delayed beyond the range, but this was not favored more strongly, and descendants did not differ in timing.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptation to beyond-range environments was not detected after 10 generations.
  • Persistence in novel habitats may not necessitate adaptation.
  • Lack of adaptation could facilitate rapid species range shifts in response to climate change.