Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field vs Thermal Ablation for Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of ADVENT
Edward P Gerstenfeld1, Moussa Mansour2, William Whang3
1University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
Autonomic denervation is an ancillary phenomenon during thermal ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), that may have synergistic effects on symptomatic improvement and long-term freedom from AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a nonthermal ablation modality, was noninferior to thermal ablation in treating AF; however, PFA's relative myocardial selectivity may minimize autonomic effects.
Objectives:
This study sought to compare heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics as markers of autonomic function after ablation using PFA vs thermal ablation.
Methods:
ADVENT (FARAPULSE ADVENT PIVOTAL Trial PFA System vs SOC Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) was a randomized pivotal study comparing PFA (pentaspline catheter) with thermal ablation (radiofrequency [RF] or cryoballoon [CB]) for treating paroxysmal AF. Baseline HR was acquired from a pre-ablation 12-lead electrocardiogram, whereas follow-up HRs, as well as HRV (standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals, standard deviation of 5-minute average RR intervals) metrics, were derived from 72-hour Holter monitors at 6 and 12 months.
Results:
This study included 379 paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PFA (n = 194) or thermal ablation (n = 185; n = 102 RF, n = 83 CB) completing 6- and 12-month Holter monitoring. Compared with PFA, thermal patients had significantly greater increases in HR from baseline to 6 months (ΔHR; 10.1 vs 5.9 beats/min; P = 0.02) and 12 months (ΔHR; 8.8 vs 5.2 beats/min; P = 0.03). This increase in HR at 6 and 12 months was similar between CB and RF (P = 0.94 and 0.83, respectively). HRV, both standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals and standard deviation of 5-minute average RR intervals, were significantly lower at both 6 and 12 months after thermal ablation compared with PFA (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
PFA's effect on the autonomic nervous system was attenuated compared with thermal ablation. Whether this affects long-term freedom from AF or symptomatic bradycardia/pauses after AF ablation requires further study.
More Related Videos
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
05:43Author Spotlight: Improving Lesion Contiguity in Pulmonary Vein Isolation via Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias