Disparities Associated with Decision to Undergo Oncologic Surgery: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Analysis
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Underrepresented minority patients with surgical cancer face care disparities. Poor patient-physician relationships and minority status were linked to declining recommended surgery, highlighting the need for improved interventions.
Area Of Science
- Surgical Oncology
- Health Disparities Research
- Patient-Physician Relationship Studies
Background
- Underrepresented minority patients with surgical malignancies experience significant outcome disparities.
- Provider-based factors like communication, trust, and cultural competency are not fully understood in relation to patient outcomes.
- This study investigates modifiable provider-based barriers impacting care for patients with surgical malignancies.
Purpose Of The Study
- To examine provider-based barriers to care for patients with surgical malignancies.
- To identify factors influencing the decision-making process for cancer surgery among diverse patient populations.
- To understand the impact of patient-physician relationships on treatment adherence.
Main Methods
- A prospective, mixed-methods study enrolled patients with lung or gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing surgical consultation.
- Surveys assessed social needs and patient-physician relationships; semi-structured interviews explored patient experiences.
- Iterative qualitative analysis identified key themes related to surgical decision-making.
Main Results
- The cohort (n=24) included 38% Black/African American patients; common cancers were lung (75%) and gastroesophageal (13%).
- Social needs like food insecurity (21%) and transportation issues (17%) were prevalent. Poor patient-physician relationships (13%), lack of trust (13%), empathy (13%), and cultural competence (13%) were reported.
- Five patients (21%) declined surgery; they were more likely to be Black, lower income, and report poor patient-physician relationships (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions
- Underrepresented minority race and poor patient-physician relationships are associated with declining recommended cancer surgery.
- Addressing modifiable provider-based factors is crucial to improve care access and reduce racial disparities in surgical oncology.
- Interventions targeting communication, trust, and cultural competency are needed to overcome these barriers.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...