Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Validation of Multi-State EHR-Based Network for Disease Surveillance (MENDS) Data and Implications for Improving Data
Katherine H Hohman1, Michael Klompas2, Bob Zambarano3
1National Association of Chronic Disease Directors, 101 W Ponce de Leon, Decatur, GA 30030 (khohman@chronicdisease.org).
Data validation is crucial for improving electronic health record (EHR) data quality in public health surveillance. The Multi-State EHR-Based Network for Disease Surveillance (MENDS) pilot project identified and resolved data quality issues to ensure accurate chronic disease prevalence estimates.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Surveillance
- Health Informatics
- Data Quality Management
Background:
- Modernization efforts increasingly utilize electronic health record (EHR) data for public health surveillance.
- EHR data streams often exhibit variability in completeness, accuracy, and representativeness, posing challenges for reliable surveillance.
- Ensuring the quality of EHR data is paramount for accurate public health insights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a validation process for the Multi-State EHR-Based Network for Disease Surveillance (MENDS) pilot project.
- To identify and resolve data quality issues impacting chronic disease prevalence estimates derived from EHR data.
- To outline actionable steps for improving EHR data quality in surveillance.
Main Methods:
- Examined MENDS validation processes across 5 data-contributing organizations from December 2020 to August 2023.
- Developed protocols to identify gaps in EHR databases and data extraction, mapping, integration, and analysis processes.
- Documented specific examples of source-data and data-processing problems.
Main Results:
- Identified critical errors in both EHR source data and data transformation processes.
- Observed issues such as missing race/ethnicity and zip code data, duplicate or missing patient records, and implausible values.
- Highlighted the impact of data quality gaps on surveillance data.
Conclusions:
- Data validation is essential for enhancing the quality and accuracy of EHR-based surveillance estimates.
- The MENDS validation process demonstrated the value of rigorous data quality checks.
- Lessons learned from this pilot project are applicable to broader EHR-based surveillance initiatives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

