Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Associations Between Multiparametric US-Based Indicators and Pathological Status in Patients with Metabolic
Yan Zhou1, Mengjin Nie2, Feng Mao3
1Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal, Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research, Center, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Objective:
Noninvasive evaluation of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) using ultrasonography holds significant clinical value. The associations between ultrasound (US)-based parameters and the pathological spectra remain unclear and controversial. This study aims to investigate the associations thoroughly.
Methods:
The participants with MAFLD undergoing liver biopsy and multiparametric ultrasonography were prospectively recruited from December 2020 to September 2022. Three US-based parameters, namely attenuation coefficient (AC), liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) were obtained. The relationship between these parameters and steatosis grades, inflammation grades and fibrosis stages was examined.
Results:
In this study with 116 participants, AC values significantly differed across distinct steatosis grades (p < 0.001), while DS and LS values varied among inflammation grades (p < 0.001) and fibrosis stages (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of AC ranged from 0.82 to 0.84 for differentiating steatosis grades, while AUCs of LS ranged from 0.62 to 0.76 for distinguishing inflammation grades and 0.83-0.95 for discerning fibrosis stages. AUCs for DS ranged from 0.79 to 0.81 in discriminating inflammation grades and 0.80-0.88 for differentiating fibrosis stages. Subgroup analysis revealed that LS demonstrated different trends in inflammation grade but consistent trends in fibrosis stage across subgroups, whereas DS showed consistent trends for both inflammation grade and fibrosis stage across all subgroups.
Conclusion:
AC values indicate the degree of hepatic steatosis but not inflammation or fibrosis. LS values are determined only by fibrosis stage and are not associated with inflammation grades. DS values are associated with both fibrosis and inflammation grades.
More Related Videos
05:37Author Spotlight: A Non-Invasive Tool to Assess and Differentiate Fat Patterns in Liver Using 3D Dixon MRI
Published on: October 20, 2023
07:12Author Spotlight: Analysis of Fluorescent-Stained Lipid Droplets with 3D Reconstruction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment
Published on: June 2, 2023