Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Bi-specific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) in prostate cancer and strategies to enhance development: hope for a BiTE-r
Harriet Lampe1, Laura Tam1, Aaron R Hansen1
1Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Care Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abstract:
Metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) continues to have poor survival rates due to limited treatment options. Bi-specific T cell engagers (BiTEs) are a promising class of novel immunotherapies with demonstrated success in haematological malignancies and melanoma. BiTEs developed for tumour associated antigens in prostate cancer have entered clinical testing. These trials have been hampered by high rates of treatment related adverse events, minimal or transient anti-tumour efficacy and generation of high titres of anti-drug antibodies. This paper aims to analyse the challenges faced by the different BiTE therapy constructs and the mCRPC tumour microenvironment that result in therapeutic resistance and identify possible strategies to overcome these issues.
Insights
Bi-specific T cell engagers (BiTEs) show promise for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) but face challenges. This review analyzes obstacles and proposes strategies to improve BiTE therapy efficacy in mCRPC treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has limited effective treatment options and poor survival rates.
- Bi-specific T cell engagers (BiTEs) are emerging immunotherapies with success in other cancers.
- Prostate cancer-specific BiTEs are in clinical trials for mCRPC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the challenges hindering BiTE therapy in mCRPC.
- To investigate the role of the mCRPC tumor microenvironment in therapeutic resistance.
- To identify strategies for overcoming current limitations in BiTE treatment for mCRPC.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of clinical trials and preclinical studies on BiTEs in mCRPC.
- Analysis of treatment-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy data.
- Examination of factors contributing to anti-drug antibody generation.
Main Results:
- Clinical trials of BiTEs in mCRPC have reported significant treatment-related adverse events.
- Observed anti-tumor efficacy has often been minimal or transient.
- High titers of anti-drug antibodies have been generated, potentially limiting efficacy.
Conclusions:
- Current BiTE constructs and the mCRPC tumor microenvironment present significant challenges to effective therapy.
- Strategies are needed to mitigate adverse events, enhance anti-tumor activity, and overcome immunogenicity.
- Further research is crucial to optimize BiTEs for improved mCRPC outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...

