Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Econometric Views (EViews)01:29

Econometric Views (EViews)

137
Econometric Views, often stylized as EViews, is a package that merges statistical analysis with econometric studies. It is designed to provide tools for time series analysis, forecasting, and econometric model simulation. The software originated from MicroTSP software and has evolved significantly since its inception in 1981. The history of EViews is marked by a continuous effort to enhance its computational speed and user interface. It was initially developed for large computing systems but...
137
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

180
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
180

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing human and AI emotional evaluations of images: GPT-4o performance across standard, persona, and language-specific prompting strategies.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

A computational model of reward learning and habits on social media.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Reference-point dependent reinforcement learning in humans and rats.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Context induces distortions in value representations across multiple elicitation methods and learning modalities.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Survivors as Agents: How Linguistic Agency Impacts Support for Survivors and Perpetrators of Sexual Assault.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

The growing concentration of national influence in global science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Political polarization in low- and middle-income countries.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Political segregation in the US workplace.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Potential mechanisms and functional significance of aperiodic neural activity.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same journal

Re-evaluating evidence for a 'naming bias' in scientific awards.

Nature human behaviour·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

691

Comparing experience- and description-based economic preferences across 11 countries.

Hernán Anlló1,2,3, Sophie Bavard4,5,6, FatimaEzzahra Benmarrakchi5,7

  • 1Human Reinforcement Learning Team, Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Paris, France. hernan.anllo@cri-paris.org.

Nature Human Behaviour
|June 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reward value is context-dependent across all cultures, influencing decisions. This cognitive trait is universal, unlike risk aversion, which varies by country.

More Related Videos

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

5.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

691
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

5.9K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology

Background:

  • Human reward value encoding is known to be context-dependent, potentially leading to suboptimal decision-making.
  • The universality of this computational constraint on valuation across diverse human populations was previously unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether context-dependent reward value encoding is a shared feature of human cognition across different cultures.
  • To differentiate the cross-cultural consistency of context-dependent valuation from description-based decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral study involving 561 individuals from 11 countries with diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds.
  • Assessed context sensitivity in reward valuation and decision-making.
  • Measured risk aversion using a separate description-based choice task (lotteries) with matched decision offers.

Main Results:

  • Context sensitivity in reward value encoding was consistently observed across all 11 studied countries.
  • Suboptimal decisions arising from context manipulation were not attributable to risk aversion.
  • Significant cross-cultural differences were found in risk aversion, but not in context-dependent valuation.

Conclusions:

  • Context-dependent reward value encoding appears to be a fundamental and universal feature of human cognition.
  • Description-based decision-making processes are more susceptible to cultural and socioeconomic influences than context-dependent valuation.
  • This suggests a robust, cross-culturally invariant mechanism underlying how humans assign value in context.