Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Statistical Analysis for Rating Scale in Clinical Trials
Mengyao Shi1, Shein-Chung Chow2
1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, 2424 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, USA. mengyao.shi@duke.edu.
Abstract:
In psychiatry clinical trials, an instrument or questionnaire with rating scale is often used to access safety and efficacy of a test treatment under investigation. Statistical analysis based on the collected rating scale is then performed a determine whether there is an improvement in endpoint change from baseline mean scale. This approach needs on absolute change, however, may not actually reflect the performance of the test treatment under study because the change, which may be considered of clinically importance, may fall within the same category in terms of disease severity such as mild, moderate, and severe. In this case, it is suggested, in addition to absolute change approach, a categorical shift analysis be considered to determine whether the endpoint change from baseline has resulted in an improvement in categorical shift, in terms of disease severity shift e.g., from severe to mild or moderate. In this article, we explore the relationship between absolute change approach and categorical shift analysis based on rating scales for assessment of test treatment under study.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Statistical Significance

