Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

08:40
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
7.4K
Mapping of spastic muscle activity after stroke: difference between passive stretch and active contraction
1Key Laboratory of Sensing Technology and Biomedical Instrument of Guangdong Province, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation
|June 14, 2024
Summary
Spastic muscles show distinct spatial activation patterns during passive stretch and active contraction compared to healthy individuals. This study used high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) to reveal these differences, advancing spasticity mechanism understanding.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Spasticity, a common motor disorder post-stroke, involves abnormal muscle overactivity.
- Understanding the spatial distribution of muscle activity is crucial for elucidating spasticity mechanisms.
- High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) offers a detailed method for assessing muscle activation patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the spatial characteristics of biceps brachii muscle activity in spastic hemiparetic subjects during passive stretch and active contraction.
- To compare these characteristics with those of healthy subjects.
- To explore the relationship between muscle activation patterns and spasticity.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 14 spastic hemiparetic subjects and 10 healthy controls.
- Recorded biceps brachii (BB) muscle activity using HD-sEMG during passive stretch at various velocities and submaximal active contractions.
- Analyzed muscle activation intensity and spatial distribution using statistical methods like ANOVA and t-tests.
Main Results:
- Spastic subjects exhibited higher intensity and velocity-dependent heterogeneous activation during passive stretch compared to controls.
- Activation distribution was more lateral and proximal in spastic subjects during active contraction.
- Observed non-overlapping activation areas between passive stretch and active contraction in spastic subjects, with passive stretch showing more distal activation.
Conclusions:
- Altered BB muscle activity in spasticity may stem from impaired descending central control post-stroke.
- Complementary spatial distributions suggest opposite motor unit recruitment patterns during passive stretch versus active contraction.
- This HD-sEMG study provides neurophysiological evidence on the spatial relationship of muscle activity in spasticity, enhancing understanding of its mechanisms.

