Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
Published on: March 6, 2017
Towards good modelling practice for parallel hybrid models for wastewater treatment processes
Loes Verhaeghe1, Jan Verwaeren2, Gamze Kirim3
1modelEAU, Université Laval, 1065 avenue de la Médecine, Québec G1V 0A6, QC, Canada; BIOVISM, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium; BIOMATH, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
A hybrid model (HM) combining mechanistic and neural network (NN) approaches improves predictions for wastewater treatment plants. The best performance was achieved using an uncalibrated mechanistic model with a convolutional neural network (CNN).
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Wastewater Treatment Technologies
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Mechanistic models in Water and Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) often have limitations in representing complex biological processes.
- Data-driven models struggle with extrapolation beyond their training data.
- Hybrid models offer a promising approach to leverage the strengths of both mechanistic and data-driven methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formulate and evaluate parallel hybrid models (HMs) for WRRFs by integrating mechanistic and data-driven components.
- To investigate the impact of calibration effort on mechanistic models versus compensation by neural networks (NNs).
- To compare the performance of different data-driven models, specifically Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs).
Main Methods:
- Constructing parallel HMs by training NNs on the residuals of mechanistic models for effluent nitrate prediction.
- Utilizing the Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1 and a large pilot-scale WRRF for experimentation.
- Comparing HMs developed with different calibration/training datasets and mechanistic model versions.
- Testing LSTM and CNN as the data-driven components within the HM framework.
Main Results:
- The parallel HM effectively addressed limitations in mechanistic model predictions and data-driven model extrapolation.
- Training the NN on an independent validation dataset yielded superior results compared to using the calibration dataset.
- The most effective HM utilized a mechanistic model with default, uncalibrated parameters.
- The CNN-based HM achieved a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 1.58 mg NO3-N/L, significantly outperforming the LSTM-based HM (RMSE = 4.17 mg NO3-N/L).
Conclusions:
- Parallel hybrid models demonstrate significant potential for improving effluent nitrate predictions in WRRFs.
- Optimizing the balance between mechanistic model calibration and NN compensation is crucial for HM performance.
- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a highly effective data-driven component for hybrid modeling in this context, outperforming LSTMs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Modeling and Similitude
Multiple Pipe Systems
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

